Rummel Julia, Voget Mareike, Hadar Ravit, Ewing Samuel, Sohr Reinhard, Klein Julia, Sartorius Alexander, Heinz Andreas, Mathé Aleksander A, Vollmayr Barbara, Winter Christine
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; International Graduate Program Medical Neurosciences, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct;81:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of several targets induces beneficial responses in approximately 60% of patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The remaining 40% indicate that these stimulation sites do not bear therapeutic relevance for all TRD patients and consequently DBS-targets should be selected according to individual symptom profiles. We here used two animal models of depression known to have different genetic backgrounds and behavioral responses: the therapy-responsive Flinders sensitive line (FSL) and the therapy-refractory congenitally learned helpless rats (cLH) to study symptom-specific DBS effects i) of different brain sites ii) at different stimulation parameters, and iii) at different expressions of the disease. Sham-stimulation/DBS was applied chronic-intermittently or chronic-continuously to either the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC, rodent equivalent to subgenual cingulate), nucleus accumbens (Nacc) or subthalamic nucleus (STN), and effects were studied on different depression-associated behaviors, i.e. anhedonia, immobility/behavioral despair and learned helplessness. Biochemical substrates of behaviorally effective versus ineffective DBS were analyzed using in-vivo microdialysis and post-mortem high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). We found that i) vmPFC-DBS outperforms Nacc-DBS, ii) STN-DBS increases depressive states, iii) chronic-continuous DBS does not add benefits compared to chronic-intermittent DBS, iv) DBS-efficacy depends on the disease expression modeled and iv) antidepressant DBS is associated with an increase in serotonin turnover alongside site-specific reductions in serotonin contents. The reported limited effectiveness of vmPFC DBS suggests that future research may consider the specific disease expression, investigation of different DBS-targets and alternative parameter settings.
对几个靶点进行深部脑刺激(DBS)可使约60%的难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者产生有益反应。其余40%的患者表明,这些刺激部位对所有TRD患者并不具有治疗相关性,因此应根据个体症状特征选择DBS靶点。我们在此使用了两种已知具有不同遗传背景和行为反应的抑郁症动物模型:对治疗有反应的弗林德斯敏感系(FSL)和对治疗难治的先天性习得性无助大鼠(cLH),以研究不同脑区、不同刺激参数以及疾病不同表现下症状特异性的DBS效应。对腹内侧前额叶皮质(vmPFC,啮齿动物相当于膝下扣带回)、伏隔核(Nacc)或丘脑底核(STN)进行慢性间歇性或慢性连续性假刺激/DBS,并研究其对不同抑郁相关行为的影响,即快感缺失、不动/行为绝望和习得性无助。使用体内微透析和死后高效液相色谱(HPLC)分析行为有效和无效的DBS的生化底物。我们发现:i)vmPFC-DBS优于Nacc-DBS;ii)STN-DBS会加重抑郁状态;iii)与慢性间歇性DBS相比,慢性连续性DBS并无额外益处;iv)DBS疗效取决于所模拟的疾病表现;v)抗抑郁DBS与5-羟色胺周转率增加以及5-羟色胺含量的部位特异性降低有关。所报道的vmPFC DBS有限的有效性表明,未来的研究可能需要考虑特定的疾病表现、对不同DBS靶点的研究以及替代参数设置。