Departments of 1 Radiation Oncology and.
Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;126(6):1749-1755. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS152530. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without whole-brain radiotherapy can be used to achieve local control (> 90%) for small brain metastases after resection. However, many brain metastases are unsuitable for SRS because of their size or previous treatment, and whole-brain radiotherapy is associated with significant neurocognitive morbidity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of surgery and iodine-125 (I) brachytherapy for brain metastases. METHODS A total of 95 consecutive patients treated for 105 brain metastases at a single institution between September 1997 and July 2013 were identified for this analysis retrospectively. Each patient underwent MRI followed by craniotomy with resection of metastasis and placement of I sources as permanent implants. The patients were followed with serial surveillance MRIs. The relationships among local control, overall survival, and necrosis were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with results of log-rank tests and multivariate regression models. RESULTS The median age at surgery was 59 years (range 29.9-81.6 years), 53% of the lesions had been treated previously, and the median preoperative metastasis volume was 13.5 cm (range 0.21-76.2 cm). Gross-total resection was achieved in 81% of the cases. The median number of I sources implanted per cavity was 28 (range 4-93), and the median activity was 0.73 mCi (range 0.34-1.3 mCi) per source. A total of 476 brain MRIs were analyzed (median MRIs per patient 3; range 0-22). Metastasis size was the strongest predictor of cavity volume and shrinkage (p < 0.0001). Multivariable regression modeling failed to predict the likelihood of local progression or necrosis according to metastasis volume, cavity volume, or the rate of cavity remodeling regardless of source activity or previous SRS. The median clinical follow-up time in living patients was 14.4 months (range 0.02-13.6 years), and crude local control was 90%. Median overall survival extended from 2.1 months in the shortest quartile to 62.3 months in the longest quartile (p < 0.0001). The overall risk of necrosis was 15% and increased significantly for lesions with a history of previous SRS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Therapeutic options for patients with large or recurrent brain metastases are limited. Data from this study suggest that resection with permanent I brachytherapy is an effective strategy for achieving local control of brain metastasis. Although metastasis volume significantly influences resection cavity size and remodeling, volumetric parameters do not seem to influence local control or necrosis. With careful patient selection, this treatment regimen is associated with minimal toxicity and can result in long-term survival for some patients. ▪ CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE Type of question: therapeutic; study design: retrospective case series; evidence: Class IV.
立体定向放射外科(SRS)联合或不联合全脑放疗可用于治疗切除术后的小脑转移瘤以实现局部控制(>90%)。然而,由于肿瘤大小或既往治疗,许多脑转移瘤不适合 SRS,且全脑放疗与显著的神经认知发病率相关。本研究旨在研究手术联合碘-125(I)近距离放疗治疗脑转移瘤的疗效和毒性。
回顾性分析了 1997 年 9 月至 2013 年 7 月期间在单一机构接受治疗的 105 例脑转移瘤患者的资料,共 95 例患者接受了治疗。每位患者在 MRI 检查后接受开颅手术切除转移瘤,并植入 I 源作为永久性植入物。对患者进行了连续的磁共振成像(MRI)监测。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计局部控制、总生存期和坏死之间的关系,并通过对数秩检验和多变量回归模型进行比较。
手术时的中位年龄为 59 岁(范围 29.9-81.6 岁),53%的病灶曾接受过治疗,术前转移瘤体积的中位数为 13.5cm³(范围 0.21-76.2cm³)。81%的病例达到了大体全切除。每个病灶腔植入的 I 源中位数为 28 个(范围 4-93 个),每个源的中位活度为 0.73mCi(范围 0.34-1.3mCi)。共分析了 476 份脑 MRI(每位患者的中位数 MRI 为 3 次;范围 0-22 次)。转移瘤大小是腔体积和缩小程度的最强预测因素(p<0.0001)。多变量回归模型无法根据转移瘤体积、腔体积或腔重塑率预测局部进展或坏死的可能性,而与源活度或既往 SRS 无关。在有生存患者的临床随访中位数为 14.4 个月(范围 0.02-13.6 年),粗局部控制率为 90%。中位总生存期从最短四分位数的 2.1 个月延长到最长四分位数的 62.3 个月(p<0.0001)。总的坏死风险为 15%,且有既往 SRS 史的病灶显著增加(p<0.05)。
对于大体积或复发性脑转移瘤患者,治疗选择有限。本研究的数据表明,切除联合永久性 I 近距离放疗是实现脑转移瘤局部控制的有效策略。尽管转移瘤体积显著影响切除腔的大小和重塑,但体积参数似乎并不影响局部控制或坏死。通过仔细的患者选择,这种治疗方案与最小的毒性相关,并可使一些患者获得长期生存。