• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

源信息通过感知偏差对反吸烟信息的心理抗拒产生的间接影响。

The Indirect Effect of Source Information on Psychological Reactance Against Antismoking Messages Through Perceived Bias.

作者信息

Kim Hyunjung

机构信息

a Department of Journalism and Visual Communication , Keimyung University.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2017 May;32(5):650-656. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1160320. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2016.1160320
PMID:27367439
Abstract

This study investigates the indirect effect of source information on attitudes toward antismoking campaigns through perceived bias and psychological reactance by employing a survey experiment (N = 416). Findings demonstrate that an editorial advocating antismoking campaigns from ideologically congruent media is perceived as less biased than the same editorial from hostile media. The perceived bias is linked to perceived threat to freedom, which, in turn, is linked to psychological reactance against the editorial, resulting in less favorable attitudes toward antismoking campaigns. Smokers are more likely to show the linkages than nonsmokers. Implications of the findings are discussed.

摘要

本研究通过一项调查实验(N = 416),考察了源信息通过感知偏差和心理抗拒对反吸烟运动态度的间接影响。研究结果表明,与来自敌对媒体的同一篇社论相比,来自意识形态一致的媒体倡导反吸烟运动的社论被认为偏差较小。感知偏差与对自由的感知威胁相关联,而这又与对社论的心理抗拒相关联,从而导致对反吸烟运动的态度不那么积极。吸烟者比非吸烟者更有可能表现出这种关联。文中讨论了研究结果的意义。

相似文献

1
The Indirect Effect of Source Information on Psychological Reactance Against Antismoking Messages Through Perceived Bias.源信息通过感知偏差对反吸烟信息的心理抗拒产生的间接影响。
Health Commun. 2017 May;32(5):650-656. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1160320. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
2
Qualitative study of Singaporean youths' perception of antismoking campaigns: what works and what does not.新加坡青少年对反吸烟运动认知的定性研究:哪些有效,哪些无效。
Tob Control. 2016 Dec;25(e2):e101-e106. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052692. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
3
The effectiveness of empathy- versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs.引起共情与恐惧的反吸烟公益广告的效果。
Health Commun. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(5):404-15. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.552480. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
4
Smoking Is So Ew!: College Smokers' Reactions to Health- Versus Social-Focused Antismoking Threat Messages.吸烟太恶心了!:大学生吸烟者对以健康与以社交为重点的反吸烟威胁信息的反应。
Health Commun. 2017 Apr;32(4):451-460. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1140264. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
5
Psychological motives versus health concerns: predicting smoking attitudes and promoting antismoking attitudes.心理动机与健康担忧:预测吸烟态度并促进反吸烟态度
Health Commun. 2009 Jan;24(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/10410230802465241.
6
A close examination of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of psychological reactance theory.特质反应和问题涉入对心理抗拒理论的调节作用的深入考察。
J Health Commun. 2011 Jul;16(6):660-79. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.551989. Epub 2011 May 24.
7
Interpersonal communication as an indirect pathway for the effect of antismoking media content on smoking cessation.人际传播是戒烟媒体内容对戒烟效果的间接途径。
J Health Commun. 2011 May;16(5):470-85. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.546487.
8
How the Media Effects Schema and the Persuasion Ethics Schema Affect Audience Responses to Antismoking Campaign Messages.媒体效果图式和说服伦理图式如何影响受众对反吸烟运动信息的反应。
Health Commun. 2018 May;33(5):526-536. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1279003. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
9
The effects of antismoking campaigns on nonsmokers in South Korea: perceived threat, attribution, and help-giving.韩国反吸烟运动对不吸烟者的影响:感知威胁、归因和给予帮助。
Psychol Health Med. 2021 Mar;26(3):366-374. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1753083. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
10
Does Reactance against Cigarette Warning Labels Matter? Warning Label Responses and Downstream Smoking Cessation amongst Adult Smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United States.对香烟警示标签的抵触情绪重要吗?澳大利亚、加拿大、墨西哥和美国成年吸烟者对警示标签的反应及后续戒烟情况。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159245. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Does source matter? Examining the effects of health experts, friends, and social media influencers on young adult perceptions of Instagram e-cigarette education messages.来源重要吗?考察健康专家、朋友和社交媒体影响者对年轻成年人对 Instagram 电子烟教育信息看法的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 May 1;258:111270. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111270. Epub 2024 Mar 20.