Suppr超能文献

依西酞普兰对心力衰竭合并抑郁患者全因死亡率和住院率的影响:MOOD-HF 随机临床试验。

Effect of Escitalopram on All-Cause Mortality and Hospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure and Depression: The MOOD-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Comprehensive Heart Failure Center and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.

Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg and Clinical Trial Center Würzburg, University Hospital Würzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.

出版信息

JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2683-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7635.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Depression is frequent in patients with heart failure and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Long-term efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in these patients are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether 24 months of treatment with escitalopram improves mortality, morbidity, and mood in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and depression.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Effects of Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibition on Morbidity, Mortality, and Mood in Depressed Heart Failure Patients (MOOD-HF) study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at 16 tertiary medical centers in Germany. Between March 2009 and February 2014, patients at outpatient clinics with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<45%) were screened for depression using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Patients with suspected depression were then invited to undergo a Structured Clinical Interview based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) to establish the diagnosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive escitalopram (10-20 mg) or matching placebo in addition to optimal heart failure therapy. Study duration was 24 months.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The composite primary outcome was time to all-cause death or hospitalization. Prespecified secondary outcomes included safety and depression severity at 12 weeks of treatment (including the titration period), which were determined using the 10-item Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (total possible score, 0 to 60; higher scores indicate more severe depression).

RESULTS

A total of 372 patients (mean age, 62 years; 24% female) were randomized and had taken at least 1 dose of study medication when the data and safety monitoring committee recommended the trial be stopped early. During a median participation time of 18.4 months (n = 185) for the escitalopram group and 18.7 months (n = 187) for the placebo group, the primary outcome of death or hospitalization occurred in 116 (63%) patients and 119 (64%) patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.27]; P = .92). The mean Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale sum score changed from 20.2 at baseline to 11.2 at 12 weeks in the escitalopram group and from 21.4 to 12.5 in the placebo group (between-group difference, -0.9 [95% CI,-2.6 to 0.7]; P = .26). Safety parameters were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and depression, 18 months of treatment with escitalopram compared with placebo did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality or hospitalization, and there was no significant improvement in depression. These findings do not support the use of escitalopram in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and depression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.com Identifier: ISRCTN33128015.

摘要

重要提示

在心力衰竭患者中,抑郁症很常见,且与不良临床结局相关。目前尚不清楚选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)在这些患者中的长期疗效和安全性。

目的

确定在慢性收缩性心力衰竭伴抑郁症患者中,24 个月的依地普仑治疗是否能改善死亡率、发病率和情绪。

设计、地点和参与者:《选择性血清素再摄取抑制对抑郁性心力衰竭患者的发病率、死亡率和情绪的影响》(MOOD-HF)研究是在德国 16 个三级医疗中心进行的一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验。2009 年 3 月至 2014 年 2 月,通过使用 9 项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9),对门诊就诊的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能 II-IV 级和左心室射血分数降低(<45%)的患者进行抑郁症筛查。对疑似抑郁症的患者,随后邀请他们接受基于精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第四版)的结构性临床访谈,以确定诊断。

干预

患者被随机分为 1:1 组,分别接受依地普仑(10-20mg)或匹配的安慰剂,同时接受最佳心力衰竭治疗。研究时间为 24 个月。

主要结局和测量指标

复合主要结局为全因死亡或住院的时间。预先设定的次要结局包括治疗 12 周时的安全性和抑郁严重程度(包括滴定期),使用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)的 10 项评分(总评分为 0-60;评分越高,抑郁越严重)来确定。

结果

共有 372 名患者(平均年龄 62 岁;24%为女性)被随机分组,在数据和安全监测委员会建议提前停止试验时,至少服用了 1 次研究药物。依地普仑组中位参与时间为 18.4 个月(n=185),安慰剂组为 18.7 个月(n=187),依地普仑组和安慰剂组的主要结局(死亡或住院)分别发生在 116(63%)例和 119(64%)例患者中(风险比,0.99[95%CI,0.76-1.27];P=0.92)。依地普仑组的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表总分从基线时的 20.2 分降至 12 周时的 11.2 分,安慰剂组从 21.4 分降至 12.5 分(组间差异,-0.9[95%CI,-2.6 至 0.7];P=0.26)。两组的安全性参数无差异。

结论和相关性

在慢性射血分数降低性心力衰竭伴抑郁的患者中,与安慰剂相比,18 个月的依地普仑治疗并未显著降低全因死亡率或住院率,且抑郁也未得到显著改善。这些发现不支持在慢性收缩性心力衰竭和抑郁症患者中使用依地普仑。

试验注册

国际标准随机对照试验号(ISRCTN):ISRCTN33128015。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验