Sriwattanakomen Roy, Mukamal Kenneth J, Shvilkin Alexei
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Oct;13(10):2076-82. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.06.030. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
QT interval prolongation is a major arrhythmia risk factor. Standard QT interval limits are defined for preserved intrinsic atrioventricular and interventricular conduction. However, ventricular pacing (VP) prolongs the QRS duration, induces electrical remodeling, and therefore obscures the intrinsic QT interval. No consensus exists on QT interval monitoring during VP.
The aim of this study was to develop an algorithm to predict the QT interval during intrinsic conduction (IC) from the VP electrocardiogram.
We measured electrocardiographic intervals QRS, QT, QTpeak, JTpeak, and TpeakTend in 38 participants with cardiac devices and preserved atrioventricular and interventricular conduction. We performed paired measurements in AAI (IC) and DDD (VP) pacing modes at equal heart rates at baseline and after 1 week of VP. We fit linear mixed models to predict IC QT intervals from VP intervals and compared their fit with other proposed methods of IC QT interval estimation.
After 1 week of VP, the IC QT interval prolonged while the VP QT interval shortened from their respective baseline values. VP QT interval shortening was due to TpeakTend interval shortening. JTpeak and QTpeak intervals prolonged in both pacing modes at 1 week. A formula using VP QTpeak interval and heart rate closely predicted the IC QT interval (r = 0.94), outperforming other methods, including subtraction of "excess" QRS duration from the actual QT interval (r = 0.64) and subtraction of fixed values from heart rate-corrected QT interval (r = 0.58 and r = 0.69). Validation in 2000 bootstrapped data sets confirmed the model's performance (r = 0.93) compared to others (r = 0.43-0.58).
In patients with VP, a formula using the QTpeak interval accurately predicts the intrinsic QT interval.
QT间期延长是主要的心律失常危险因素。标准QT间期限值是针对保留的固有房室和室内传导定义的。然而,心室起搏(VP)会延长QRS时限,诱发电重构,从而掩盖固有QT间期。关于VP期间的QT间期监测尚无共识。
本研究的目的是开发一种算法,从VP心电图预测固有传导(IC)期间的QT间期。
我们在38名装有心脏装置且保留房室和室内传导的参与者中测量了心电图间期QRS、QT、QTpeak、JTpeak和TpeakTend。我们在基线时以及VP 1周后,以相等心率在AAI(IC)和DDD(VP)起搏模式下进行配对测量。我们拟合线性混合模型,从VP间期预测IC QT间期,并将其拟合与其他提议的IC QT间期估计方法进行比较。
VP 1周后,IC QT间期延长,而VP QT间期从各自的基线值缩短。VP QT间期缩短是由于TpeakTend间期缩短。1周时,两种起搏模式下的JTpeak和QTpeak间期均延长。使用VP QTpeak间期和心率的公式能很好地预测IC QT间期(r = 0.94),优于其他方法,包括从实际QT间期减去“多余”的QRS时限(r = 0.64)以及从心率校正的QT间期减去固定值(r = 0.58和r = 0.69)。在2000个自助数据集上的验证证实了该模型的性能(r = 0.93),相比其他方法(r = 0.43 - 0.58)更优。
在VP患者中,使用QTpeak间期的公式可准确预测固有QT间期。