House Clarissa M, Sharma M D, Okada Kensuke, Hosken David J
*Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ, UK
*Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ, UK.
Integr Comp Biol. 2016 Oct;56(4):682-93. doi: 10.1093/icb/icw079. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
Sexual selection can operate before and after copulation and the same or different trait(s) can be targeted during these episodes of selection. The direction and form of sexual selection imposed on characters prior to mating has been relatively well described, but the same is not true after copulation. In general, when male-male competition and female choice favor the same traits then there is the expectation of reinforcing selection on male sexual traits that improve competitiveness before and after copulation. However, when male-male competition overrides pre-copulatory choice then the opposite could be true. With respect to studies of selection on genitalia there is good evidence that male genital morphology influences mating and fertilization success. However, whether genital morphology affects reproductive success in more than one context (i.e., mating versus fertilization success) is largely unknown. Here we use multivariate analysis to estimate linear and nonlinear selection on male body size and genital morphology in the flour beetle Gnatocerus cornutus, simulated in a non-competitive (i.e., monogamous) setting. This analysis estimates the form of selection on multiple traits and typically, linear (directional) selection is easiest to detect, while nonlinear selection is more complex and can be stabilizing, disruptive, or correlational. We find that mating generates stabilizing selection on male body size and genitalia, and fertilization causes a blend of directional and stabilizing selection. Differences in the form of selection across these bouts of selection result from a significant alteration of nonlinear selection on body size and a marginally significant difference in nonlinear selection on a component of genital shape. This suggests that both bouts of selection favor similar genital phenotypes, whereas the strong stabilizing selection imposed on male body size during mate acquisition is weak during fertilization.
性选择可在交配前后发挥作用,并且在这些选择过程中可以针对相同或不同的性状。交配前施加于性状的性选择的方向和形式已得到较为充分的描述,但交配后的情况并非如此。一般来说,当雄性间竞争和雌性选择有利于相同性状时,预期会加强对雄性性性状的选择,从而提高交配前后的竞争力。然而,当雄性间竞争凌驾于交配前的选择时,情况可能相反。关于生殖器选择的研究有充分证据表明,雄性生殖器形态会影响交配和受精成功率。然而,生殖器形态是否会在不止一种情况下(即交配成功率与受精成功率)影响生殖成功率,在很大程度上尚不清楚。在此,我们使用多变量分析来估计在非竞争(即一夫一妻制)环境下模拟的面粉甲虫角胫夜蛾雄性体型和生殖器形态的线性和非线性选择。这种分析估计了对多个性状的选择形式,通常,线性(定向)选择最容易检测到,而非线性选择则更为复杂,可以是稳定的、分裂的或相关的。我们发现,交配会对雄性体型和生殖器产生稳定选择,而受精则导致定向选择和稳定选择的混合。这些选择过程中选择形式的差异源于体型非线性选择的显著改变以及生殖器形状一个组成部分的非线性选择的微小显著差异。这表明这两个选择过程都有利于相似的生殖器表型,而在求偶过程中对雄性体型施加的强烈稳定选择在受精过程中则较弱。