• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塞伦盖蒂西部狮子的景观水平移动模式:比较种间竞争、栖息地属性和猎物可利用性的影响。

Landscape-level movement patterns by lions in western Serengeti: comparing the influence of inter-specific competitors, habitat attributes and prey availability.

机构信息

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 Canada ; Present address: The Wilderness &Wildlife Conservation Trust, 130 Reid Avenue, Colombo 04, Sri Lanka.

Tazania Wildlife Research Institute, P.O. Box 661, Arusha, United Republic of Tanzania.

出版信息

Mov Ecol. 2016 Jul 1;4:17. doi: 10.1186/s40462-016-0082-9. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s40462-016-0082-9
PMID:27375849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4929767/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Where apex predators move on the landscape influences ecosystem structure and function and is therefore key to effective landscape-level management and species-specific conservation. However the factors underlying predator distribution patterns within functional ecosystems are poorly understood. Predator movement should be sensitive to the spatial patterns of inter-specific competitors, spatial variation in prey density, and landscape attributes that increase individual prey vulnerability. We investigated the relative role of these fundamental factors on seasonal resource utilization by a globally endangered apex carnivore, the African lion (Panthera leo) in Tanzania's Serengeti National Park. Lion space use was represented by novel landscape-level, modified utilization distributions (termed "localized density distributions") created from telemetry relocations of individual lions from multiple neighbouring prides. Spatial patterns of inter-specific competitors were similarly determined from telemetry re-locations of spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta), this system's primary competitor for lions; prey distribution was derived from 18 months of detailed census data; and remote sensing data was used to represent relevant habitat attributes.

RESULTS

Lion space use was consistently influenced by landscape attributes that increase individual prey vulnerability to predation. Wet season activity, when available prey were scarce, was concentrated near embankments, which provide ambush opportunities, and dry season activity, when available prey were abundant, near remaining water sources where prey occurrence is predictable. Lion space use patterns were positively associated with areas of high prey biomass, but only in the prey abundant dry season. Finally, at the broad scale of this analysis, lion and hyena space use was positively correlated in the comparatively prey-rich dry season and unrelated in the wet season, suggesting lion movement was unconstrained by the spatial patterns of their main inter-specific competitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of potential prey and vulnerability of that prey to predation both motivate lion movement decisions, with their relative importance apparently mediated by overall prey abundance. With practical and theoretical implications, these results suggest that while top carnivores are consistently cognizant of how landscape features influence individual prey vulnerability, they also adopt a flexible approach to range use by adjusting spatial behaviour according to fluctuations in local prey abundance.

摘要

背景

顶级掠食者在景观中的移动方式会影响生态系统的结构和功能,因此对于有效的景观管理和特定物种的保护至关重要。然而,在功能生态系统中,支配捕食者分布模式的因素还知之甚少。捕食者的移动应该对种间竞争的空间格局、猎物密度的空间变化以及增加个体猎物易感性的景观属性敏感。我们调查了这些基本因素对坦桑尼亚塞伦盖蒂国家公园一种全球濒危的顶级掠食者——非洲狮(Panthera leo)在季节性资源利用中的相对作用。狮子的空间利用由个体狮子的遥测重新定位创建的新颖的景观水平、修改后的利用分布(称为“本地化密度分布”)来表示。来自多个相邻狮群的个体狮子的遥测重新定位;同样,来自鬣狗(Crocuta crocuta)的遥测重新定位确定了种间竞争者的空间模式,鬣狗是狮子的主要竞争者;猎物分布来自 18 个月的详细普查数据;并使用遥感数据来表示相关的栖息地属性。

结果

狮子的空间利用一直受到增加个体猎物易感性的景观属性的影响。在可用猎物稀少的湿季,活动集中在堤岸附近,这些堤岸提供了伏击机会,而在可用猎物丰富的干季,活动集中在剩余水源附近,那里猎物的出现是可预测的。狮子的空间利用模式与高猎物生物量的区域呈正相关,但仅在猎物丰富的干季。最后,在这项分析的广泛范围内,狮子和鬣狗的空间利用在相对猎物丰富的干季呈正相关,而在湿季无关,这表明狮子的移动不受主要种间竞争者的空间模式的限制。

结论

潜在猎物的可利用性和猎物对捕食的易感性都激发了狮子的移动决策,它们的相对重要性显然受到整体猎物丰度的调节。这些结果具有实际和理论意义,表明尽管顶级掠食者始终意识到景观特征如何影响个体猎物的易感性,但它们还通过根据当地猎物丰度的波动调整空间行为来采用灵活的方法来使用范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/7d848339c746/40462_2016_82_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/d6900b111396/40462_2016_82_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/22b247647552/40462_2016_82_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/4b1e09834f40/40462_2016_82_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/474d35890181/40462_2016_82_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/0580db16c131/40462_2016_82_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/4973cb601b20/40462_2016_82_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/1250bd2a6f6a/40462_2016_82_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/f173bc71cdc5/40462_2016_82_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/7d848339c746/40462_2016_82_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/d6900b111396/40462_2016_82_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/22b247647552/40462_2016_82_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/4b1e09834f40/40462_2016_82_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/474d35890181/40462_2016_82_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/0580db16c131/40462_2016_82_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/4973cb601b20/40462_2016_82_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/1250bd2a6f6a/40462_2016_82_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/f173bc71cdc5/40462_2016_82_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd56/4929767/7d848339c746/40462_2016_82_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Landscape-level movement patterns by lions in western Serengeti: comparing the influence of inter-specific competitors, habitat attributes and prey availability.塞伦盖蒂西部狮子的景观水平移动模式:比较种间竞争、栖息地属性和猎物可利用性的影响。
Mov Ecol. 2016 Jul 1;4:17. doi: 10.1186/s40462-016-0082-9. eCollection 2016.
2
Spatial patterns of African ungulate aggregation reveal complex but limited risk effects from reintroduced carnivores.非洲有蹄类动物聚集的空间模式揭示了重新引入的食肉动物带来的复杂但有限的风险影响。
Ecology. 2016 May;97(5):1123-34. doi: 10.1890/15-0707.1.
3
Spatial heterogeneity facilitates carnivore coexistence.空间异质性促进了食肉动物的共存。
Ecology. 2021 May;102(5):e03319. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3319.
4
Lion and spotted hyena distributions within a buffer area of the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem.狮子和斑点鬣狗在塞伦盖蒂-马赛马拉生态系统缓冲区内的分布情况。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 15;11(1):22289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01518-6.
5
Dynamic interactions between apex predators reveal contrasting seasonal attraction patterns.顶级捕食者之间的动态相互作用揭示了相反的季节性吸引模式。
Oecologia. 2021 Jan;195(1):51-63. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04802-w. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
In the absence of a "landscape of fear": How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist.在没有“恐惧景观”的情况下:狮子、鬣狗和猎豹如何共存。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Nov 6;6(23):8534-8545. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2569. eCollection 2016 Dec.
7
Spatial and temporal avoidance of risk within a large carnivore guild.大型食肉动物群落内风险的时空规避
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 16;7(1):189-199. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2616. eCollection 2017 Jan.
8
Leopard and spotted hyena densities in the Lake Mburo National Park, southwestern Uganda.乌干达西南部姆布罗国家公园的豹和斑点鬣狗密度。
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 27;10:e12307. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12307. eCollection 2022.
9
A global assessment of large terrestrial carnivore kill rates.大型陆生食肉动物捕杀率的全球评估。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Feb;100(1):327-350. doi: 10.1111/brv.13143. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
10
Lions and leopards coexist without spatial, temporal or demographic effects of interspecific competition.狮子和豹子共存,没有种间竞争的空间、时间或种群动态效应。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Nov;87(6):1709-1726. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12883. Epub 2018 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Coursing hyenas and stalking lions: The potential for inter- and intraspecific interactions.追逐鬣狗和跟踪狮子:种间和种内相互作用的可能性。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 3;18(2):e0265054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265054. eCollection 2023.
2
Factors influencing lion movements and habitat use in the western Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西部塞伦盖蒂生态系统中影响狮子活动和栖息地利用的因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 7;12(1):18890. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22053-y.
3
Group density, disease, and season shape territory size and overlap of social carnivores.

本文引用的文献

1
Exclusion by interference competition? The relationship between red and arctic foxes.通过干扰竞争实现排斥?赤狐与北极狐之间的关系。
Oecologia. 2002 Jul;132(2):213-220. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0967-8. Epub 2002 Jul 1.
2
Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality.狼会根据当地栖息地质量调整领地大小,而非狼群规模。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Sep;84(5):1177-86. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12366. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
3
Space-use behaviour of woodland caribou based on a cognitive movement model.基于认知运动模型的林地驯鹿空间利用行为
群体密度、疾病和季节影响着群居食肉动物的领地大小和重叠程度。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Jan;90(1):87-101. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13294. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Maximising camera trap data: Using attractants to improve detection of elusive species in multi-species surveys.最大化相机陷阱数据:利用诱饵提高多物种调查中难以捉摸物种的检测率。
PLoS One. 2019 May 29;14(5):e0216447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216447. eCollection 2019.
5
A cross-validation-based approach for delimiting reliable home range estimates.一种基于交叉验证的方法,用于界定可靠的活动范围估计值。
Mov Ecol. 2017 Sep 6;5:19. doi: 10.1186/s40462-017-0110-4. eCollection 2017.
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jul;84(4):1059-70. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12357. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
4
The Lion King and the Hyaena Queen: large carnivore interactions and coexistence.《狮子王与鬣狗女王:大型食肉动物的相互作用与共存》
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 Nov;90(4):1197-214. doi: 10.1111/brv.12152. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
5
Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.世界上最大的食肉动物的现状和生态影响。
Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):1241484. doi: 10.1126/science.1241484.
6
Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores.为了原地不动而迁移:非洲大型食肉动物共存的行为机制。
Ecology. 2013 Nov;94(11):2619-31. doi: 10.1890/13-0217.1.
7
Predator confusion is sufficient to evolve swarming behaviour.捕食者混淆足以促使群体行为进化。
J R Soc Interface. 2013 Jun 5;10(85):20130305. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0305. Print 2013 Aug 6.
8
Risk avoidance in sympatric large carnivores: reactive or predictive?同域大型食肉动物的风险规避:反应性还是预测性?
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Sep;82(5):1098-105. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12077. Epub 2013 May 20.
9
Body size and the division of niche space: food and predation differentially shape the distribution of Serengeti grazers.体型大小和生态位分化:食物和捕食对塞伦盖蒂食草动物的分布有不同的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jan;81(1):201-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01885.x. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
10
Fear of darkness, the full moon and the nocturnal ecology of African lions.对黑暗、满月和非洲狮夜间生态的恐惧。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022285. Epub 2011 Jul 20.