Ng Zenithson Y, Stokes Jennifer E, Alvarez Lucia, Bartges Joe W
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996-4544.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2016 Sep;26(5):720-8. doi: 10.1111/vec.12503. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
To clinically characterize a group of thrombocytopenic dogs that received cryopreserved platelet concentrate (cPC) transfusion, assess efficacy of cPC treatment in improving patient outcome, and compare treated dogs to a control population of thrombocytopenic dogs that did not receive cPC transfusions.
Retrospective study.
University teaching hospital.
Eighty-six client-owned dogs (43 in treatment group, 43 in control group).
None.
Medical records of thrombocytopenic dogs that received cPC transfusions and those of thrombocytopenic dogs that did not receive cPC (control population) from January 2007 through March 2013 were reviewed. Dogs receiving cPC were statistically more likely than controls to have a platelet trigger for cPC transfusion (P = 0.01), lower platelet count (P = 0.009) and hematocrit at presentation (P = 0.001), and lower hematocrit after cPC (P = 0.02). Although there was a statistically significant increase in platelet count from pre- to post-cPC transfusion (P = 0.002), cPC was not found to be effective in improving clinical bleeding or increasing survival compared to the control group. No other characteristics were statistically different between groups. No dogs receiving cPC had an acute transfusion reaction during hospitalization.
In the population described in this study, cPC was not found to increase survival, but was well tolerated. Controlled, prospective studies are necessary to determine indications for and efficacy of cPC transfusions.
对一组接受冷冻保存血小板浓缩液(cPC)输血的血小板减少症犬进行临床特征分析,评估cPC治疗对改善患者预后的疗效,并将接受治疗的犬与未接受cPC输血的血小板减少症犬对照组进行比较。
回顾性研究。
大学教学医院。
86只客户拥有的犬(治疗组43只,对照组43只)。
无。
回顾了2007年1月至2013年3月期间接受cPC输血的血小板减少症犬和未接受cPC输血的血小板减少症犬(对照组)的病历。接受cPC输血的犬在统计学上比对照组更有可能因血小板原因接受cPC输血(P = 0.01),输血时血小板计数更低(P = 0.009),血细胞比容更低(P = 0.001),cPC输血后血细胞比容也更低(P = 0.02)。虽然从输血前到输血后血小板计数有统计学上的显著增加(P = 0.002),但与对照组相比,未发现cPC在改善临床出血或提高生存率方面有效。两组之间没有其他特征在统计学上有差异。接受cPC输血的犬在住院期间均未发生急性输血反应。
在本研究描述的犬群中,未发现cPC能提高生存率,但耐受性良好。需要进行对照的前瞻性研究来确定cPC输血的适应症和疗效。