重症监护病房中血小板输注的应用:适应证、输血触发因素及血小板计数反应

Utilization of platelet transfusions in the intensive care unit: indications, transfusion triggers, and platelet count responses.

作者信息

Arnold Donald M, Crowther Mark A, Cook Richard J, Sigouin Christopher, Heddle Nancy M, Molnar Laura, Cook Deborah J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2006 Aug;46(8):1286-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00892.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A description of current platelet (PLT) transfusion practice in the intensive care unit (ICU) is needed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

All thrombocytopenic patients (PLT count, <150 x 10(9)/L) who received PLT transfusions were identified from a previous prospective study of consecutive medical-surgical ICU patients; trauma, orthopedic, and cardiac surgery were exclusions. Risk factors for ineffective transfusions were examined.

RESULTS

Of 261 ICU patients, 118 (45.2%) had thrombocytopenia and a PLT count nadir of less than 50 x 10(9) per L (n = 22), 50 to 99 x 10(9) per L (n = 37), and 100 to 149 x 10(9) per L (n = 59). Twenty-seven (22.9%) patients received PLT transfusions (n = 76 transfusions) and 37 (31.4%) had major bleeding. PLT dose was approximately 3 to 4 x 10(11) per L transfusion. Therapeutic (n = 24) and prophylactic (n = 52) PLT transfusion triggers were 51 x 10(9) per L (interquartile range [IQR], 26 to 68) and 41 x 10(9) per L (IQR, 20 to 57), respectively, as measured at a median of 4.5 hours (IQR, <1.6 to 6.9) before transfusion. A single PLT transfusion resulted in a median PLT increase of 14 x 10(9) per L (IQR, -2 to 30) measured at 5.2 hours (IQR, 1.8 to 8.8) after the transfusion; however, no PLT count increase was observed after 17 transfusions given to 13 (48.1%) patients. No risk factors for ineffective transfusions were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Among critically ill patients, most PLT transfusions were administered to prevent, rather than to treat, bleeding, with a transfusion trigger of 40 to 50 x 10(9) per L. Nearly half of ICU patients who received transfusions failed to mount a PLT count increase after a single transfusion. Prospective studies are needed to determine the effects of PLT transfusions on bleeding and predictors of ineffective transfusions in the ICU.

摘要

背景

需要对重症监护病房(ICU)目前的血小板(PLT)输注实践进行描述。

研究设计与方法

从先前一项对连续入住内科 - 外科ICU患者的前瞻性研究中,识别出所有接受PLT输注的血小板减少症患者(PLT计数<150×10⁹/L);创伤、骨科和心脏手术患者被排除在外。研究了无效输注的危险因素。

结果

261例ICU患者中,118例(45.2%)存在血小板减少症,血小板计数最低点分别为每升低于50×10⁹(n = 22)、50至99×10⁹(n = 37)以及100至149×10⁹(n = 59)。27例(22.9%)患者接受了PLT输注(共输注76次),37例(31.4%)发生大出血。PLT输注剂量约为每升3至4×10¹¹。治疗性(n = 24)和预防性(n = 52)PLT输注触发阈值分别为每升51×10⁹(四分位间距[IQR],26至68)和每升41×10⁹(IQR,20至57),在输注前中位数4.5小时(IQR,<1.6至6.9)时测量。单次PLT输注后,在输注后5.2小时(IQR,1.8至8.8)测量,血小板计数中位数增加14×10⁹/L(IQR, - 2至30);然而,在给予13例(48.1%)患者的17次输注后,未观察到血小板计数增加。未发现无效输注的危险因素。

结论

在重症患者中,大多数PLT输注是用于预防而非治疗出血,输注触发阈值为每升40至50×10⁹。近一半接受输注的ICU患者在单次输注后血小板计数未增加。需要进行前瞻性研究以确定PLT输注对ICU患者出血的影响以及无效输注的预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索