Suppr超能文献

动脉扩张与波反射降低。地来洛尔在高血压治疗中的益处。

Arterial dilation and reduced wave reflection. Benefit of dilevalol in hypertension.

作者信息

Kelly R, Daley J, Avolio A, O'Rourke M

机构信息

Medical Professorial Unit, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Hypertension. 1989 Jul;14(1):14-21. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.14.1.14.

Abstract

We compared dilevalol (an isomer of labetalol), 200-400 mg daily, against atenolol, 50-100 mg daily, in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial with respect to effects on arterial distensibility (measured as pulse wave velocity [PWV]) and wave reflection (assessed from carotid pressure wave contour). Twelve patients of mean age 58 years (range 44-73 years) with essential hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure 95-114 mm Hg) took active therapy for 12 weeks, separated by a 2-4 week placebo period. Carotid pressure waveforms were recorded noninvasively by applanation tonometry with a Millar micromanometer-tipped probe. PWV was measured between carotid and femoral arteries (aortic PWV), carotid and radial arteries (arm PWV), and femoral and pedal arteries (leg PWV). Early wave reflection was calculated from the ratio of the height of the peak of the carotid wave above its shoulder to the pulse pressure and was expressed as an augmentation index. Both drugs were equally effective in reducing brachial sphygmomanometric pressure and PWV in all three regions (active vs. placebo, p less than 0.001), but there was no significant difference between the two active therapies. However, the augmentation index (averaged during the treatment period) was significantly lower with dilevalol (19%) than with atenolol (28%, p less than 0.01), corresponding to a greater decrease of 5-8 mm Hg in carotid systolic pressure compared with the brachial artery. Although both drugs were equally effective in reducing arterial distensibility, the vasodilating action of dilevalol gave added benefit in reducing wave reflection, presumably through its vasodilatory effect on peripheral conduit arteries.

摘要

在一项双盲、交叉、安慰剂对照试验中,我们比较了每日200 - 400毫克的二醋洛尔(拉贝洛尔的一种异构体)和每日50 - 100毫克的阿替洛尔对动脉扩张性(以脉搏波速度[PWV]衡量)和波反射(根据颈动脉压力波轮廓评估)的影响。12名平均年龄58岁(范围44 - 73岁)的原发性高血压患者(仰卧位舒张压95 - 114毫米汞柱)接受了12周的积极治疗,中间间隔2 - 4周的安慰剂期。使用带有Millar微压力计探头的压平式眼压计无创记录颈动脉压力波形。在颈动脉和股动脉之间(主动脉PWV)、颈动脉和桡动脉之间(手臂PWV)以及股动脉和足背动脉之间(腿部PWV)测量PWV。早期波反射通过颈动脉波峰高于其肩部的高度与脉压之比计算得出,并表示为增强指数。两种药物在降低所有三个区域的肱动脉血压计测量压力和PWV方面同样有效(积极治疗组与安慰剂组相比,p小于0.001),但两种积极治疗之间没有显著差异。然而,二醋洛尔治疗期间的平均增强指数(19%)显著低于阿替洛尔(28%,p小于0.01),与肱动脉相比,颈动脉收缩压相应降低了5 - 8毫米汞柱。尽管两种药物在降低动脉扩张性方面同样有效,但二醋洛尔的血管舒张作用在减少波反射方面有额外益处,可能是通过其对外周传导动脉的血管舒张作用实现的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验