Suleiman M S, Najib N, el-Sayed Y, Hasan M, Abdulahameed M
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1989 Jun;27(6):276-9.
The bioavailability of an in vitro sustained-release formulation of diclofenac sodium was compared with a conventional product in six healthy male volunteers. The administration of a single dose (100 mg) of either formulation in a crossover design revealed significant differences in the extent of absorption as assessed by AUC. The relative bioavailability of the sustained-release formulation was found to be 53% compared with the conventional product. The Cmax for the sustained release formulation (0.54 +/- 0.29 micrograms ml-1) was significantly much lower than the corresponding value for the conventional formulation (4.12 +/- 0.91). However, the tmax for the sustained release formulation (3.6 +/- 2.1 h) was not significantly different from the corresponding value for the conventional formulation (2.5 +/- 0.4 h). Although the sustained release formulation showed serum concentration-time profiles characteristic of sustained products in vivo, it failed to attain therapeutic drug levels. The in vivo results were found inconsistent with the in vitro availability of the drug.
在六名健康男性志愿者中,将双氯芬酸钠体外缓释制剂的生物利用度与常规产品进行了比较。采用交叉设计给予单剂量(100毫克)的任一制剂,通过AUC评估发现吸收程度存在显著差异。与常规产品相比,缓释制剂的相对生物利用度为53%。缓释制剂的Cmax(0.54±0.29微克/毫升)显著低于常规制剂的相应值(4.12±0.91)。然而,缓释制剂的tmax(3.6±2.1小时)与常规制剂的相应值(2.5±0.4小时)无显著差异。尽管缓释制剂在体内显示出持续产品的血清浓度-时间曲线特征,但它未能达到治疗药物水平。发现体内结果与药物的体外可用性不一致。