Di Liberto Valentina, Mudò Giuseppa, Garozzo Roberta, Frinchi Monica, Fernandez-Dueñas Víctor, Di Iorio Patrizia, Ciccarelli Renata, Caciagli Francesco, Condorelli Daniele F, Ciruela Francisco, Belluardo Natale
Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Palermo Palermo, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Unit of Medical Biochemistry, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Front Pharmacol. 2016 Jun 17;7:158. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00158. eCollection 2016.
Guanine-based purines (GBPs) have been recently proposed to be not only metabolic agents but also extracellular signaling molecules that regulate important functions in the central nervous system. In such way, GBPs-mediated neuroprotection, behavioral responses and neuronal plasticity have been broadly described in the literature. However, while a number of these functions (i.e., GBPs neurothophic effects) have been well-established, the molecular mechanisms behind these GBPs-dependent effects are still unknown. Furthermore, no plasma membrane receptors for GBPs have been described so far, thus GBPs are still considered orphan neuromodulators. Interestingly, an intricate and controversial functional interplay between GBPs effects and adenosine receptors activity has been recently described, thus triggering the hypothesis that GBPs mechanism of action might somehow involve adenosine receptors. Here, we review recent data describing the GBPs role in the brain. We focus on the involvement of GBPs regulating neuronal plasticity, and on the new hypothesis based on putative GBPs receptors. Overall, we expect to shed some light on the GBPs world since although these molecules might represent excellent candidates for certain neurological diseases management, the lack of putative GBPs receptors precludes any high throughput screening intent for the search of effective GBPs-based drugs.
基于鸟嘌呤的嘌呤(GBPs)最近被提出不仅是代谢因子,而且是调节中枢神经系统重要功能的细胞外信号分子。通过这种方式,文献中广泛描述了GBPs介导的神经保护、行为反应和神经元可塑性。然而,虽然其中一些功能(即GBPs的神经营养作用)已经得到充分证实,但这些依赖GBPs的效应背后的分子机制仍然未知。此外,迄今为止尚未描述GBPs的质膜受体,因此GBPs仍被视为孤儿神经调节剂。有趣的是,最近描述了GBPs效应与腺苷受体活性之间复杂且有争议的功能相互作用,从而引发了GBPs的作用机制可能以某种方式涉及腺苷受体的假说。在此,我们综述了描述GBPs在大脑中作用的最新数据。我们重点关注GBPs在调节神经元可塑性方面的作用,以及基于假定的GBPs受体的新假说。总体而言,我们期望能为GBPs领域带来一些启示,因为尽管这些分子可能是某些神经系统疾病治疗的优秀候选药物,但缺乏假定的GBPs受体阻碍了任何基于高通量筛选来寻找有效的GBP类药物的尝试。