Department of Marine and Environmental Science, Hampton University, 100 East Queen Street, Hampton, VA 23668, USA.
Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5B6.
Conserv Physiol. 2016 Jan 13;4(1):cov059. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cov059. eCollection 2016.
Populations of tunas, billfishes and pelagic sharks are fished at or over capacity in many regions of the world. They are captured by directed commercial and recreational fisheries (the latter of which often promote catch and release) or as incidental catch or bycatch in commercial fisheries. Population assessments of pelagic fishes typically incorporate catch-per-unit-effort time-series data from commercial and recreational fisheries; however, there have been notable changes in target species, areas fished and depth-specific gear deployments over the years that may have affected catchability. Some regional fisheries management organizations take into account the effects of time- and area-specific changes in the behaviours of fish and fishers, as well as fishing gear, to standardize catch-per-unit-effort indices and refine population estimates. However, estimates of changes in stock size over time may be very sensitive to underlying assumptions of the effects of oceanographic conditions and prey distribution on the horizontal and vertical movement patterns and distribution of pelagic fishes. Effective management and successful conservation of pelagic fishes requires a mechanistic understanding of their physiological and behavioural responses to environmental variability, potential for interaction with commercial and recreational fishing gear, and the capture process. The interdisciplinary field of conservation physiology can provide insights into pelagic fish demography and ecology (including environmental relationships and interspecific interactions) by uniting the complementary expertise and skills of fish physiologists and fisheries scientists. The iterative testing by one discipline of hypotheses generated by the other can span the fundamental-applied science continuum, leading to the development of robust insights supporting informed management. The resulting species-specific understanding of physiological abilities and tolerances can help to improve stock assessments, develop effective bycatch-reduction strategies, predict rates of post-release mortality, and forecast the population effects of environmental change. In this synthesis, we review several examples of these interdisciplinary collaborations that currently benefit pelagic fisheries management.
在世界许多地区,金枪鱼、旗鱼和远洋鲨鱼种群的捕捞量达到或超过了其承受能力。这些鱼类被捕捞是为了商业和娱乐目的(后者通常鼓励捕捞后放生),或是商业捕捞的附带渔获物或兼捕渔获物。远洋鱼类的种群评估通常包括来自商业和娱乐渔业的捕捞努力量时间序列数据;然而,近年来目标物种、捕捞区域和特定深度渔具的部署都发生了显著变化,这可能影响了捕捞效率。一些区域渔业管理组织考虑到鱼类和渔民行为以及渔具在时间和区域上的变化对捕捞努力量指数的标准化和种群估计的影响。然而,随着时间的推移,对种群规模变化的估计可能非常敏感,这取决于海洋条件和猎物分布对远洋鱼类水平和垂直运动模式和分布的影响的基本假设。有效的管理和成功的保护远洋鱼类需要对其对环境变化、与商业和娱乐渔具相互作用的潜力以及捕捞过程的生理和行为反应有一个机制上的理解。保护生理学的跨学科领域可以通过整合鱼类生理学家和渔业科学家的互补专业知识和技能,为了解远洋鱼类的种群动态和生态学(包括环境关系和种间相互作用)提供深入的认识。一个学科对另一个学科提出的假设进行迭代测试,可以跨越基础应用科学的连续体,为提供明智管理的有力见解奠定基础。由此产生的对特定物种生理能力和耐受性的理解,可以帮助改进种群评估、制定有效的减少兼捕策略、预测放生后死亡率、以及预测环境变化对种群的影响。在这篇综述中,我们回顾了一些目前有益于远洋渔业管理的跨学科合作的例子。