Hanson Mark D, Moineau Geneviève, Kulasegaram Kulamakan Mahan, Hammond Robert
M.D. Hanson is professor, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. G. Moineau is president and CEO, Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada, and associate professor, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. K. Kulasegaram is education scientist, Wilson Centre, and assistant professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. R. Hammond is professor, Departments of Pathology and Clinical Neurological Sciences, and associate dean (admissions), Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11):1501-1508. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001286.
The report by the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC) entitled "The Future of Medical Education in Canada: A Collective Vision for MD Education" includes recommendations to enhance admissions processes and increase national collaboration. To achieve these goals, the AFMC conducted a nationwide environmental scan appraising medical schools' readiness for national collaboration and progress toward establishing "made-in-Canada" admissions processes. A critical narrative review of the academic and gray literature was conducted as part of this environmental scan. Four core admissions practice and policy domains were identified: (1) social accountability strategies, (2) standardized admissions testing, (3) interviewing procedures, and (4) application procedures.In this article, the authors summarize and discuss the findings of this narrative review with regard to the four domains. They provide documentation of historical and present-day admissions factors relevant to Canadian medical schools' readiness for nationwide collaboration and a descriptive analysis of the facilitators and barriers to establishing "made-in-Canada" admissions processes.All four domains had facilitators and barriers. One barrier, however, cut across multiple domains-medical schools' pursuit of prestige and its potential to conflict with the goals of the other domains. The authors recommend holding a national forum to debate these issues and to advance the AFMC's goals, a process that will not be straightforward. Yet, national collaboration holds promise for applicants, medical schools, and Canada's diverse population of patients, so efforts toward this end must continue.
加拿大医学院协会(AFMC)发布的题为《加拿大医学教育的未来:医学博士教育的共同愿景》的报告提出了加强招生流程和增加全国合作的建议。为实现这些目标,AFMC在全国范围内进行了一次环境扫描,评估医学院校开展全国合作的准备情况以及在建立“加拿大本土”招生流程方面取得的进展。作为此次环境扫描的一部分,对学术文献和灰色文献进行了批判性叙述性综述。确定了四个核心招生实践和政策领域:(1)社会问责策略,(2)标准化招生考试,(3)面试程序,以及(4)申请程序。在本文中,作者总结并讨论了关于这四个领域的叙述性综述结果。他们提供了与加拿大医学院校开展全国合作的准备情况相关的历史和当前招生因素的文档,并对建立“加拿大本土”招生流程的促进因素和障碍进行了描述性分析。所有四个领域都存在促进因素和障碍。然而,有一个障碍贯穿多个领域——医学院校追求声誉及其可能与其他领域目标产生冲突的情况。作者建议举办一次全国性论坛来辩论这些问题并推进AFMC的目标,这一过程不会一帆风顺。然而,全国合作对申请人、医学院校以及加拿大多样化的患者群体都有希望,因此必须继续为此努力。