Suppr超能文献

我们可能会对潜在的医学院申请者说些什么?在加拿大 17 所医学院的网站上,卓越、公平和多样性的话语。

What might we be saying to potential applicants to medical school? Discourses of excellence, equity, and diversity on the web sites of Canada's 17 medical schools.

机构信息

Centre for Medical Education, Department of Integrated Studies in Education, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1323-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318267663a.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Medical school Web sites often advance arguments to claim institutional excellence and appeal to the "best and the brightest" who might join their institutions as medical students. What do these texts communicate about institutional excellence, or the excellence of potential applicants to medical school? How are discourses related to social accountability, such as those concerning diversity and equity, represented?

METHOD

From July through December 2010, using the concepts of excellence, equity, and diversity, the authors examined the discourses identified on the Web sites of Canada's 17 medical schools, focusing on faculty welcome pages, deans' messages, and those pages specifically targeting applicants to medicine.

RESULTS

Institutional prestige and applicant suitability were generally promoted through discourses of academic excellence such as research, innovation, and global positioning. Service-to-society discourses were much less prominent. Diversity discourses emerged primarily as appeals to institutions' cosmopolitan sophistication. Equity, when mentioned, tended to focus on increasing the participation of indigenous and rural students in medicine. Institutional positioning can be situated on a continuum from the more "centric" (typical academic excellence claims) to the more "eccentric" (excellence claims grounded in local contexts such as service to a region or constituency).

CONCLUSIONS

Discourses can play a central role in regulating social institutional practices. It is worthwhile for medical schools to examine the messages that medical schools are communicating on their Web sites. If schools are to move beyond prestige-based characterizations of excellence and build a socially accountable profession, open and inclusive discussions are needed.

摘要

目的

医学院校网站常提出一些论点,声称机构卓越,并吸引可能以医学生身份加入其机构的“最优秀和最聪明”的人。这些文本传达了哪些关于机构卓越或潜在医学生申请人卓越的信息?社会责任方面的论述如何得到体现,例如多样性和公平性方面的论述?

方法

2010 年 7 月至 12 月期间,作者运用卓越、公平和多样性的概念,检查了加拿大 17 所医学院校网站上确定的论述,重点是教员欢迎页面、院长信息以及专门针对医学生申请人的页面。

结果

机构声望和申请人适宜性通常通过学术卓越的论述来提升,如研究、创新和全球定位。服务于社会的论述则不太突出。多样性论述主要表现为对机构国际化复杂性的呼吁。提到公平时,往往侧重于增加土著和农村学生在医学领域的参与度。机构定位可以置于一个连续体上,从更“中心”(典型的学术卓越主张)到更“偏心”(以服务于一个地区或选区等本地背景为基础的卓越主张)。

结论

论述在规范社会制度实践方面可以发挥核心作用。医学院校有必要审查其网站上发布的信息。如果学校要超越以声望为基础的卓越描述,并建立一个对社会负责的专业,就需要进行公开和包容的讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验