Cuschieri Kate, Geraets Daan, Cuzick Jack, Cadman Louise, Moore Catherine, Vanden Broeck Davy, Padalko Elisaveta, Quint Wim, Arbyn Marc
Scottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Sep;54(9):2337-42. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00897-16. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
The Validation of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotyping Tests (VALGENT) studies offer an opportunity to clinically validate HPV assays for use in primary screening for cervical cancer and also provide a framework for the comparison of analytical and type-specific performance. Through VALGENT, we assessed the performance of the cartridge-based Xpert HPV assay (Xpert HPV), which detects 14 high-risk (HR) types and resolves HPV16 and HPV18/45. Samples from women attending the United Kingdom cervical screening program enriched with cytologically abnormal samples were collated. All had been previously tested by a clinically validated standard comparator test (SCT), the GP5+/6+ enzyme immunoassay (EIA). The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert HPV for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) and CIN3+ relative to those of the SCT were assessed as were the inter- and intralaboratory reproducibilities according to international criteria for test validation. Type concordance for HPV16 and HPV18/45 between the Xpert HPV and the SCT was also analyzed. The Xpert HPV detected 94% of CIN2+ and 98% of CIN3+ lesions among all screened women and 90% of CIN2+ and 96% of CIN3+ lesions in women 30 years and older. The specificity for CIN1 or less (≤CIN1) was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80 to 85%) in all women and 88% (95% CI, 86 to 91%) in women 30 years and older. Inter- and intralaboratory agreements for the Xpert HPV were 98% and 97%, respectively. The kappa agreements for HPV16 and HPV18/45 between the clinically validated reference test (GP5+/6+ LMNX) and the Xpert HPV were 0.92 and 0.91, respectively. The clinical performance and reproducibility of the Xpert HPV are comparable to those of well-established HPV assays and fulfill the criteria for use in primary cervical cancer screening.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)基因分型检测验证(VALGENT)研究为在宫颈癌初筛中临床验证HPV检测方法提供了契机,也为分析性能和型特异性性能的比较提供了框架。通过VALGENT,我们评估了基于试剂盒的Xpert HPV检测方法(Xpert HPV)的性能,该方法可检测14种高危(HR)型别,并区分HPV16和HPV18/45。收集了来自参加英国宫颈癌筛查项目的女性的样本,其中富含细胞学异常样本。所有样本之前均已通过临床验证的标准对照检测(SCT),即GP5+/6+酶免疫测定(EIA)进行检测。评估了Xpert HPV相对于SCT检测宫颈上皮内瘤变2级或更高级别(CIN2+)和CIN3+的临床敏感性和特异性,以及根据国际检测验证标准的实验室间和实验室内重复性。还分析了Xpert HPV与SCT之间HPV16和HPV18/45的型别一致性。Xpert HPV在所有筛查女性中检测出94%的CIN2+病变和98%的CIN3+病变,在30岁及以上女性中检测出90%的CIN2+病变和96%的CIN3+病变。在所有女性中,CIN1或更低级别(≤CIN1)的特异性为83%(95%置信区间[CI],80至85%),在30岁及以上女性中为88%(95%CI,86至91%)。Xpert HPV的实验室间和实验室内一致性分别为98%和97%。临床验证的参考检测(GP5+/6+ LMNX)与Xpert HPV之间HPV16和HPV18/45的kappa一致性分别为0.92和0.91。Xpert HPV的临床性能和重复性与成熟的HPV检测方法相当,满足宫颈癌初筛使用标准。