Laine Marc, Frere Corinne, Cuisset Thomas, Paganelli Franck, Morange Pierre-Emmanuel, Dignat-George Francoise, Berbis Julie, Camoin-Jau Laurence, Bonello Laurent
Service de cardiologie, Centre hospitalo-universitaire, Aix-Marseille université, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France; MARS cardio, Mediterranean Association for Research and Studies in Cardiology, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Aix-Marseille Université, INSERM UMR-S 1076, Vascular Research Center of Marseille, Marseille, France; Service d'hématologie Biologique, Centre hospitalo-universitaire Timone, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.247. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
Clinical trials have demonstrated an excess of acute stent thrombosis (AST) in acute coronary syndromes patients (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bivalirudin compared to heparin. We aimed to investigate the potential mechanisms responsible for thrombus formation under bivalirudin.
We compared heparin and bivalirudin during PCI for ACS in a prospective monocentre randomized study. Twenty patients were included after coronary angiography and received a loading dose (LD) of 180mg of ticagrelor at the time of PCI. They were randomly assigned to heparin (70UI/kg) intra-venous (IV) bolus or bivalirudin IV bolus of 0.75mg/kg followed by an infusion of 1.75mg/kg/h until the end of the PCI. The VASP index and thrombin generation test were used to assess the course of platelet reactivity (PR) and thrombin generation.
Thrombin generation and PR were identical in both groups at baseline. There was no difference in the course of PR following the LD over time. An optimal PR inhibition was reached 4h after the LD of ticagrelor. Heparin and bivalirudin infusion effectively inhibited thrombin generation during PCI. However, 4h after the end of bivalirudin infusion, thrombin generation had returned to its baseline value whereas in the heparin group it remained significantly inhibited compared to baseline and to the bivalirudin group 4h after the end of the infusion (p<0.01 and p<0.02 respectively).
The present study suggests that the short half-life of bivalirudin and the quick restoration of thrombin activity at a time when optimal PR is not reached may be responsible for acute stent thrombosis. Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT02428725.
临床试验表明,与肝素相比,接受比伐卢定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征患者(ACS)发生急性支架血栓形成(AST)的情况更多。我们旨在研究比伐卢定治疗下血栓形成的潜在机制。
在一项前瞻性单中心随机研究中,我们比较了肝素和比伐卢定在ACS患者PCI过程中的应用。20例患者在冠状动脉造影后入选,并在PCI时接受180mg替格瑞洛的负荷剂量(LD)。他们被随机分配接受静脉注射(IV)70UI/kg肝素推注或0.75mg/kg比伐卢定IV推注,随后以1.75mg/kg/h的速度输注直至PCI结束。采用VASP指数和凝血酶生成试验评估血小板反应性(PR)过程和凝血酶生成情况。
两组在基线时凝血酶生成和PR相同。LD后PR随时间的变化过程无差异。替格瑞洛LD后4小时达到最佳PR抑制。肝素和比伐卢定输注在PCI期间有效抑制了凝血酶生成。然而,比伐卢定输注结束后4小时,凝血酶生成已恢复至基线值,而肝素组与基线相比以及与输注结束后4小时的比伐卢定组相比,凝血酶生成仍受到显著抑制(分别为p<0.01和p<0.02)。
本研究表明,比伐卢定半衰期短以及在未达到最佳PR时凝血酶活性迅速恢复可能是急性支架血栓形成的原因。Clinicaltrial.gov:NCT02428725。