Suppr超能文献

[中观层面开放型普通精神科住院治疗的结局质量——德国一家城市综合医院的观察性研究]

[Outcome Quality of Open General Psychiatric Inpatient Treatment at the Meso Level - an Observational Study in an Urban German General Hospital].

作者信息

Langrock C, Bonnet U

出版信息

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2016 Jun;84(6):354-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106579. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inpatient treatment (meso level) in psychiatric hospitals is commonly assumed to be effective. However, there is very little evidence-based data on this issue.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

First evaluation of the outcome quality of an inpatient general psychiatric treatment in a German general hospital using multifaceted quality indicators (symptom severity, wellbeing, self-efficacy, depressive avoidance, patients' satisfaction with the treatment) was carried out. Patients with a wide range of psychiatric diagnoses (ICD-10 F2-F6) were randomly assigned to this naturalistic single-group pre-post study. For ethical and methodological reasons, only adult inpatients treated in open general psychiatric wards were enrolled.

RESULTS

The sample (n = 110, 58.2 % females) had a mean age of 47.2 (SD 15.9) years. 67 (60.9 %) and 29 (26.4 %) patients had at least one or two additional psychiatric diagnoses, respectively. 84 (76.4 %) and 62 (56.4 %) patients had a minimum of one or two additional somatic diagnoses, respectively. The treatment lasted 38 (SD 36; median 28.5) days. Significant positive treatment effects for all quality indicators were found at regular hospital discharge. The effect sizes varied between Cohen's d = 0.17 - 0.62 ("intention-to-treat" population, n = 110) and d = 0.28 - 0.99 ("completer" population, n = 70).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study provides direct evidence for the effectiveness of an open inpatient general psychiatric hospital treatment at the meso level. The results, however, are not representative for all German general psychiatric wards because of major differences between hospitals in personnel resources and framework conditions.

摘要

背景

精神病医院的住院治疗(中观层面)通常被认为是有效的。然而,关于这个问题几乎没有基于证据的数据。

目的和方法

使用多方面的质量指标(症状严重程度、幸福感、自我效能感、抑郁回避、患者对治疗的满意度)对德国一家综合医院的住院普通精神科治疗的结局质量进行了首次评估。患有广泛精神科诊断(国际疾病分类第十版F2 - F6)的患者被随机分配到这个自然主义的单组前后对照研究中。出于伦理和方法学原因,仅纳入在开放式普通精神科病房接受治疗的成年住院患者。

结果

样本(n = 110,58.2%为女性)的平均年龄为47.2(标准差15.9)岁。分别有67名(60.9%)和29名(26.4%)患者至少有一种或两种额外的精神科诊断。分别有84名(76.4%)和62名(56.4%)患者至少有一种或两种额外的躯体诊断。治疗持续了38(标准差36;中位数28.5)天。在定期出院时,所有质量指标均发现了显著的积极治疗效果。效应量在Cohen's d = 0.17 - 0.62(“意向性治疗”人群,n = 110)和d = 0.28 - 0.99(“完成治疗”人群,n = 70)之间变化。

讨论与结论

本研究为开放式住院普通精神科医院治疗在中观层面的有效性提供了直接证据。然而,由于医院在人力资源和框架条件方面存在重大差异,这些结果并不代表所有德国普通精神科病房。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验