• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学中的灵魂:犹太教拉比与科学的争议

The Soul in Medicine: Rabbinic and Scientific Controversies.

作者信息

Zukier Henri

机构信息

Graduate Division, Program of Jewish Studies, Rothberg International School, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2016 Dec;55(6):2174-88. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0280-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10943-016-0280-1
PMID:27393702
Abstract

The practice of medicine relies on a combination of two very different sources, and requires two kinds of talents: a cognitive-instrumental, knowledge-based and disease-centered approach; and a psychological, expressive-relational and patient-centered approach. Throughout the centuries, the mix between the cognitive and expressive dimensions, and the relative emphasis given to each approach, has varied considerably. Current evidence-based medicine privileges the cognitive-performative dimension. The recent developments within medicine are indicative of the inherent and lasting tension between the cognitive and expressive dimensions. Not surprisingly, then, related terms of debate are also apparent in medieval rabbinic discussions of medical practice. However, the rabbinic and medical traditions resolved the tension in very different ways. This paper explores a conceptual link between the modern dynamics of the cognitive and the socio-relational dimensions, and a complementary rabbinic controversy starting in the thirteenth century, originally between Maimonides and Nahmanides, both physicians. There are significant interactions between the modern evolution in the roles of doctors and patients, and the rabbinic approaches to physicians and illness. The mapping of the two debates about doctors and patients suggests that the tension between science and soul, and the dynamics of integrating them, has characterized medicine through the ages, though they can lead to different outcomes.

摘要

医学实践依赖于两种截然不同的来源的结合,需要两种才能:一种是认知工具性的、基于知识且以疾病为中心的方法;另一种是心理性的、表达性-关系性且以患者为中心的方法。几个世纪以来,认知维度和表达维度之间的结合,以及对每种方法的相对重视程度,都有很大差异。当前的循证医学优先考虑认知-执行维度。医学领域的最新发展表明了认知维度和表达维度之间内在且持久的紧张关系。因此,毫不奇怪,相关的辩论术语在中世纪拉比关于医学实践的讨论中也很明显。然而,拉比传统和医学传统以非常不同的方式解决了这种紧张关系。本文探讨了认知维度和社会关系维度的现代动态之间的概念联系,以及始于13世纪的一场拉比之间的补充性争论,最初是在迈蒙尼德和拿单之间展开的,他们两人都是医生。医生和患者角色的现代演变与拉比关于医生和疾病的方法之间存在着重要的相互作用。关于医生和患者的两场辩论的映射表明,科学与灵魂之间的紧张关系以及整合它们的动态过程,一直是贯穿各个时代医学的特征,尽管它们可能导致不同的结果。

相似文献

1
The Soul in Medicine: Rabbinic and Scientific Controversies.医学中的灵魂:犹太教拉比与科学的争议
J Relig Health. 2016 Dec;55(6):2174-88. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0280-1.
2
Prevention in Halakhah.《哈拉卡中的预防措施》
Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Mar;9(3):180-2.
3
A Survey of Multidenominational Rabbis on Death by Neurologic Criteria.多宗派拉比对神经标准判定死亡的调查。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Oct;31(2):411-418. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00742-3.
4
Halachic infertility: rabbis, doctors, and the struggle over professional boundaries.犹太教法下的不孕不育:拉比、医生和专业边界之争。
Med Anthropol. 2013;32(3):208-26. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2012.674992.
5
[Complementary medicine--Jewish medical ethics].[补充医学——犹太医学伦理]
Harefuah. 2011 Aug;150(8):672-5, 686.
6
The incorporation of pre-modern scientific theories into Rabbinic literature: the case of innate heat.
Torah U Madda J. 1998;8:181-99.
7
[Medicine, physicians and medical ethics in Jewish tradition through the ages].
Harefuah. 2014 Aug;153(8):489-92, 496.
8
Bikkur Holim: the origins of Jewish pastoral care.比库尔·霍利姆:犹太教牧养关怀的起源
J Health Care Chaplain. 2008;15(2):99-113. doi: 10.1080/08854720903152497.
9
A tale of two stones: the impact of medical history on contemporary medical Halakhah.两颗石头的故事:病史对当代医学哈拉卡的影响。
BDD. 1997 Summer(5):33-40.
10
The Care of the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Patient.极端正统派犹太患者的护理
J Relig Health. 2017 Apr;56(2):545-560. doi: 10.1007/s10943-017-0356-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects.安慰剂效应的生物学、临床和伦理进展。
Lancet. 2010 Feb 20;375(9715):686-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61706-2.
2
Psychoneuro-oncology: its time has arrived.
Arch Dermatol. 2009 Dec;145(12):1439-42. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.306.
3
A duty to deceive: placebos in clinical practice.有欺骗之责:临床实践中的安慰剂。
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Dec;9(12):4-12. doi: 10.1080/15265160903318350.
4
Spirituality, social support, and survival in hemodialysis patients.血液透析患者的精神状态、社会支持与生存情况
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Nov;3(6):1620-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01790408. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
5
A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought.安慰剂效应的全面综述:最新进展与当前观点
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:565-90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.113006.095941.
6
Diagnostic error in internal medicine.内科诊断错误。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 11;165(13):1493-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.13.1493.
7
Overt versus covert treatment for pain, anxiety, and Parkinson's disease.疼痛、焦虑和帕金森病的公开与隐蔽治疗。
Lancet Neurol. 2004 Nov;3(11):679-84. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00908-1.
8
Effects of perceived treatment on quality of life and medical outcomes in a double-blind placebo surgery trial.双盲安慰剂手术试验中感知治疗对生活质量和医疗结局的影响。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;61(4):412-20. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.4.412.
9
The powerful placebo.强效安慰剂
J Am Med Assoc. 1955 Dec 24;159(17):1602-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02960340022006.
10
Arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 21;347(21):1717-9; author reply 1717-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200211213472117.