Wang Xin, Zhao Xiaozhi, Lin Tingsheng, Guo Hongqian
The Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1593-600. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1349-1. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) has been used to ablate renal neoplasms with good outcome. However, if bowel lies adjacent to a tumor, ablation increases the risk of thermal bowel injury, and the consequences could be fatal. We describe the technique, effectiveness and safety of using thermo-sensitive hydrogel as insulation to displace the bowel away during PRFA.
The study was divided into two main parts: the in vitro and in vivo studies. In in vitro study, to explore the heat insulation of hydrogel, the rabbit kidney was entirely embedded in hydrogel, and then radiofrequency ablation was performed; the temperature on the gel-air and gel-kidney interfaces was measured. In in vivo study, hydrogel of poloxamer 407, 25 % concentration (w/v), was instilled into the perinephric space of 10 rabbits under CT guidance to separate the kidney from adjacent bowel before PRFA performed in the targeted parenchyma in the gel group. For the control group, PRFA was performed in similar portions of 10 rabbits without instillation of hydrogel. Some parameters were recorded such as kidney-to-bowel and electrode-to-bowel distance. Immediately after PRFA, distribution of hydrogel was evaluated and the dimension of radiofrequency ablation zone was measured; bowel thermal injury was compared between the gel and control groups by gross anatomy and histopathological examination. To assess safety, two additional follow-up groups with 10 rabbits in each were set; after PRFA, CT scan was performed every 2 days; gel absorption, thermal damage and some other complications were evaluated during the period.
In in vitro study, temperature was significantly lower at the gel-air than gel-kidney interface (P < .05), and the temperature gradient was positively associated with gel thickness. In in vivo study, hydrogel was instilled successfully in all rabbits in the gel group. The kidney-to-bowel and electrode-to-bowel distances were larger in the gel than control group [(1.1 ± 0.6 cm vs 0.1 ± 0.0 cm, P < .01), (1.8 ± 0.4 cm vs 0.5 ± 0.1 cm, P < .01), respectively]. The gel and control groups did not differ in size of the ablation zones (0.80 ± 0.2 cm vs 0.75 ± 0.3 cm, P > .05). Thermal injury in adjacent bowel was more serious in the control than gel group (P < .01). As for the follow-up, rabbits with gel instillation showed good condition and gel was absorbed gradually within 5 days. Those rabbits with no bowel displacement by gel got significantly lower survival rate and high complication rate (P < .01).
Hydrogel-dissection by means of thermo-sensitive hydrogel instillation is valuable for protecting the bowel adjacent to ablation area against thermal injury during PRFA.
经皮射频消融术(PRFA)已用于消融肾肿瘤,效果良好。然而,如果肠道紧邻肿瘤,消融会增加热损伤肠道的风险,其后果可能是致命的。我们描述了在PRFA期间使用热敏水凝胶作为绝缘体来推开肠道的技术、有效性和安全性。
本研究分为两个主要部分:体外研究和体内研究。在体外研究中,为探究水凝胶的隔热性能,将兔肾完全嵌入水凝胶中,然后进行射频消融;测量凝胶-空气界面和凝胶-肾界面的温度。在体内研究中,在CT引导下将浓度为25%(w/v)的泊洛沙姆407水凝胶注入10只兔的肾周间隙,以在对凝胶组的目标实质进行PRFA之前将肾与相邻肠道分离。对于对照组,在10只兔的相似部位进行PRFA,不注入水凝胶。记录一些参数,如肾与肠道以及电极与肠道的距离。PRFA后立即评估水凝胶的分布并测量射频消融区的大小;通过大体解剖和组织病理学检查比较凝胶组和对照组的肠道热损伤情况。为评估安全性,另外设置两个每组10只兔的随访组;PRFA后每2天进行一次CT扫描;在此期间评估凝胶吸收、热损伤和其他一些并发症。
在体外研究中,凝胶-空气界面的温度显著低于凝胶-肾界面(P <.05),且温度梯度与凝胶厚度呈正相关。在体内研究中,凝胶组的所有兔均成功注入水凝胶。凝胶组的肾与肠道以及电极与肠道的距离大于对照组[分别为(1.1±0.6 cm对0.1±0.0 cm,P <.01),(1.8±0.4 cm对0.5±0.1 cm,P <.01)]。凝胶组和对照组的消融区大小无差异(0.80±0.2 cm对0.75±0.3 cm,P >.05)。对照组相邻肠道的热损伤比凝胶组更严重(P <.01)。至于随访,注入凝胶的兔状况良好,凝胶在5天内逐渐吸收。那些未通过凝胶实现肠道移位的兔存活率显著降低且并发症发生率高(P <.01)。
通过注入热敏水凝胶进行水凝胶分离对于在PRFA期间保护消融区域附近的肠道免受热损伤具有重要价值。