Suppr超能文献

比较燃烧型香烟和仅加热烟草型香烟的人体尿液致突变性研究。

Human urine mutagenicity study comparing cigarettes which burn or only heat tobacco.

作者信息

Doolittle D J, Rahn C A, Burger G T, Davis R, deBethizy J D, Howard G, Lee C K, McKarns S C, Riccio E, Robinson J

机构信息

Bowman Gray Technical Center, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC 27102.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1989 Jun;223(2):221-32. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(89)90050-5.

Abstract

Cigarette smokers have been reported to void urine which is more mutagenic, as measured in the Ames bacterial mutation assay, than urine voided by non-smokers. Condensate from the mainstream smoke of a cigarette which heats, but does not burn tobacco (test cigarette) showed no evidence of mutagenicity in a battery of in vitro genotoxicity assays under conditions in which condensate from the mainstream smoke of cigarettes that burn tobacco was mutagenic. The objective of this study was to determine whether the absence of mutagenic activity observed in the in vitro assays would be reflected in the urine of smokers of the test cigarette. 72 subjects (31 smokers and 41 non-smokers) were enrolled in a 6-week study, with the smokers randomly divided into 2 groups. The study was designed as a double crossover, with each smoker smoking both test (tobacco-heating) and reference (tobacco-burning) cigarettes. This design allowed each smoker to serve as his or her own control while at the same time allowing comparisons between groups of non-smokers and smokers of both test and reference cigarettes. 24-h urine samples were collected twice a week and concentrated using XAD-2 resin. Urine concentrates were tested in Ames bacterial strains TA98 and TA100, with and without metabolic activation and with and without beta-glucuronidase/aryl sulfatase. Individuals who smoked the test cigarette voided urine which was significantly less mutagenic than that voided when they smoked reference cigarettes. The mutagenicity of urine from smokers who smoked the test cigarette and non-smokers did not differ under any of the assay conditions used in this study.

摘要

据报道,吸烟者排出的尿液在艾姆斯细菌突变试验中比不吸烟者排出的尿液具有更强的致突变性。一种加热但不燃烧烟草的卷烟(试验卷烟)主流烟雾的冷凝物,在一系列体外遗传毒性试验中未显示出致突变性,而燃烧烟草的卷烟主流烟雾的冷凝物在这些试验条件下具有致突变性。本研究的目的是确定体外试验中观察到的无致突变活性是否会在试验卷烟吸烟者的尿液中得到体现。72名受试者(31名吸烟者和41名不吸烟者)参与了一项为期6周的研究,吸烟者被随机分为两组。该研究设计为双交叉试验,每位吸烟者同时吸食试验(加热烟草)卷烟和对照(燃烧烟草)卷烟。这种设计使每位吸烟者能够作为自己的对照,同时也能对不吸烟者以及试验卷烟和对照卷烟吸烟者组之间进行比较。每周收集两次24小时尿液样本,并用XAD - 2树脂进行浓缩。尿液浓缩物在艾姆斯细菌菌株TA98和TA100中进行测试,分别在有和无代谢激活以及有和无β - 葡萄糖醛酸酶/芳基硫酸酯酶的情况下进行。吸食试验卷烟的吸烟者排出的尿液致突变性明显低于他们吸食对照卷烟时排出的尿液。在本研究使用的任何试验条件下,吸食试验卷烟的吸烟者和不吸烟者尿液的致突变性均无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验