Loh Erwin, Morris Jennifer, Thomas Laura, Bismark Marie Magdaleen, Phelps Grant, Dickinson Helen
Monash Health, Clayton, Australia and Monash University , Clayton, Australia.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Australia.
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2016 Jul 4;29(3):313-30. doi: 10.1108/LHS-12-2015-0044.
Purpose The paper aims to explore the beliefs of doctors in leadership roles of the concept of "the dark side", using data collected from interviews carried out with 45 doctors in medical leadership roles across Australia. The paper looks at the beliefs from the perspectives of doctors who are already in leadership roles themselves; to identify potential barriers they might have encountered and to arrive at better-informed strategies to engage more doctors in the leadership of the Australian health system. The research question is: "What are the beliefs of medical leaders that form the key themes or dimensions of the negative perception of the 'dark side'?". Design/methodology/approach The paper analysed data from two similar qualitative studies examining medical leadership and engagement in Australia by the same author, in collaboration with other researchers, which used in-depth semi-structured interviews with 45 purposively sampled senior medical leaders in leadership roles across Australia in health services, private and public hospitals, professional associations and health departments. The data were analysed using deductive and inductive approaches through a coding framework based on the interview data and literature review, with all sections of coded data grouped into themes. Findings Medical leaders had four key beliefs about the "dark side" as perceived through the eyes of their own past clinical experience and/or their clinical colleagues. These four beliefs or dimensions of the negative perception colloquially known as "the dark side" are the belief that they lack both managerial and clinical credibility, they have confused identities, they may be in conflict with clinicians, their clinical colleagues lack insight into the complexities of medical leadership and, as a result, doctors are actively discouraged from making the transition from clinical practice to medical leadership roles in the first place. Research limitations/implications This research was conducted within the Western developed-nation setting of Australia and only involved interviews with doctors in medical leadership roles. The findings are therefore limited to the doctors' own perceptions of themselves based on their past experiences and beliefs. Future research involving doctors who have not chosen to transition to leadership roles, or other health practitioners in other settings, may provide a broader perspective. Also, this research was exploratory and descriptive in nature using qualitative methods, and quantitative research can be carried out in the future to extend this research for statistical generalisation. Practical implications The paper includes implications for health organisations, training providers, medical employers and health departments and describes a multi-prong strategy to address this important issue. Originality/value This paper fulfils an identified need to study the concept of "moving to the dark side" as a negative perception of medical leadership and contributes to the evidence in this under-researched area. This paper has used data from two similar studies, combined together for the first time, with new analysis and coding, looking at the concept of the "dark side" to discover new emergent findings.
目的 本文旨在利用对澳大利亚45位担任医疗领导职务的医生进行访谈所收集的数据,探讨担任领导职务的医生对“黑暗面”概念的看法。本文从已担任领导职务的医生的角度审视这些看法;识别他们可能遇到的潜在障碍,并得出更明智的策略,以促使更多医生参与澳大利亚医疗系统的领导工作。研究问题是:“构成对‘黑暗面’负面认知的关键主题或维度的医疗领导者的看法是什么?” 设计/方法/途径 本文分析了来自两项类似定性研究的数据,这两项研究由同一作者与其他研究人员合作,对澳大利亚医疗领导与参与情况进行了研究,研究采用深度半结构化访谈,对澳大利亚各地卫生服务机构、私立和公立医院、专业协会及卫生部门中45位经过有目的抽样的担任高级医疗领导职务的人员进行了访谈。通过基于访谈数据和文献综述的编码框架,运用演绎和归纳方法对数据进行分析,将编码数据的所有部分归为不同主题。 发现 通过自身过去的临床经验和/或临床同事的视角,医疗领导者对“黑暗面”有四个关键看法。这四个构成负面认知的看法或维度,通俗地称为“黑暗面”,分别是:他们认为自己缺乏管理和临床可信度,身份混淆,可能与临床医生发生冲突,临床同事对医疗领导的复杂性缺乏洞察力,因此,从一开始就积极劝阻医生从临床实践转向医疗领导角色。 研究局限性/影响 本研究在澳大利亚这个西方发达国家的背景下进行,且仅涉及对担任医疗领导职务的医生的访谈。因此,研究结果仅限于医生基于自身过去的经验和信念对自己的看法。未来涉及未选择转向领导角色的医生或其他环境中的其他卫生从业者的研究,可能会提供更广阔的视角。此外,本研究本质上是探索性和描述性的定性研究,未来可开展定量研究以扩展本研究进行统计归纳。 实际意义 本文包含了对卫生组织、培训提供者、医疗雇主和卫生部门的启示,并描述了应对这一重要问题的多管齐下策略。 原创性/价值 本文满足了研究“转向黑暗面”这一作为对医疗领导负面认知概念的明确需求,并为这一研究不足的领域提供了证据。本文首次将来自两项类似研究的数据结合在一起,并进行了新的分析和编码,审视“黑暗面”概念以发现新出现的研究结果。