Suppr超能文献

[精神病学中的强制性干预措施:预防与患者偏好]

[Coercive Interventions in Psychiatry: Prevention and Patients' Preferences].

作者信息

Mielau Juliane, Altunbay Jasmin, Heinz Andreas, Reuter Benedikt, Bermpohl Felix, Rentzsch Johannes, Lehmann Anja, Montag Christiane

机构信息

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Mitte (PUK Charité im SHK), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.

出版信息

Psychiatr Prax. 2017 Sep;44(6):316-322. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105861. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

Abstract

This study explores patients' preferences and measures of prevention of coercive methods in psychiatric treatment. Structured interviews of 90 patients with psychotic disorders were undertaken, most of whom had previously experienced coercive methods. Participants saw preventive potential in a wider availability of individual non-pharmacological therapy, improvement of staff professional competence and communication skills, high staff-to-patient ratios and retreat facilities. The majority of participants preferred forced medication and manual restraint in case of self-endangerment, and forced medication and mechanical restraint in the event of endangerment of others. Patients' suggestions relating to prevention of coercion are in line with most expert's opinions. In case coercive methods are required, manual restraint and application of forced medication is accepted as the treatment of choice according to most patients in case of self-endangerment.

摘要

本研究探讨了患者在精神科治疗中对强制方法的偏好及预防措施。对90名精神障碍患者进行了结构化访谈,其中大多数人此前曾经历过强制方法。参与者认为,增加个体非药物治疗的可及性、提高工作人员的专业能力和沟通技巧、保持高医护患比以及提供隔离设施具有预防潜力。大多数参与者倾向于在患者自我伤害时采用强制用药和人工约束,在患者危及他人时采用强制用药和机械约束。患者提出的预防强制行为的建议与大多数专家的意见一致。在需要采取强制方法的情况下,大多数患者认为在患者自我伤害时,人工约束和强制用药是首选治疗方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验