Suppr超能文献

救护车排队候诊的伦理问题。

The ethics of ambulance ramping.

作者信息

Perry Matthew, Carter Drew

机构信息

Paramedic Emergency Care, Department of Applied Health and Professional Development, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.

School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Feb;29(1):116-118. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12625. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

Abstract

Ramping is the practice of requiring paramedics to continue to care for patients rather than hand over clinical responsibility to the ED. It arose as an alternative to admitting patients to EDs that are deemed to be already operating at or beyond capacity. This paper analyses the ethics of ramping. Ramping has been embraced by some ED practitioners and policymakers as a solution to the problem of ED patients suffering increased risks of harm as a result of waiting times within ED. However, this perspective fails to adequately consider the implications, especially the opportunity cost of requiring paramedics to remain at the hospital rather than make themselves available for other patients. From this perspective, ramping negatively impacts the wider provision of emergency medical services, with potentially serious consequences for people's health. Advocates of ramping must consider people in the community who require a medical emergency response.

摘要

“缓交”是指要求护理人员继续照顾患者,而不是将临床责任移交给急诊科的做法。它是作为一种替代方案出现的,用于应对那些被认为已经满负荷或超负荷运转的急诊科无法收治患者的情况。本文分析了“缓交”的伦理问题。一些急诊科从业者和政策制定者将“缓交”视为解决急诊科患者因等待时间过长而面临更大伤害风险这一问题的方法。然而,这种观点没有充分考虑其影响,尤其是要求护理人员留在医院而不是去为其他患者服务所带来的机会成本。从这个角度来看,“缓交”会对更广泛的紧急医疗服务提供产生负面影响,可能对人们的健康造成严重后果。“缓交”的倡导者必须考虑社区中需要紧急医疗响应的人群。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验