Fitzpatrick David, Maxwell Douglas, Craigie Alan
Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland.
Royal Alexandra Hospital Paisley, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Corsebar Rd, Paisley, Glasgow, PA2 9PN, Scotland.
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Jun 25;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0168-3.
Poor communication during patient handover is recognised internationally as a root cause of a significant proportion of preventable deaths. Data used in handover is not always easily recorded using ambulance based tablets, particularly in time-critical cases. Paramedics have therefore developed pragmatic workarounds (writing on gloves or scrap paper) to record these data. However, such practices can conflict with policy, data recorded can be variable, easily lost and negatively impact on handover quality.
This study aimed to measure the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, low tech intervention, designed to support clinical information recording and delivery during pre-alert and handover within the pre-hospital and ED setting. A simple pre and post-test design was used with a historical control. Eligible participants included all ambulance clinicians based at one large city Ambulance Station (n = 69) and all nursing and physician staff (n = 99) based in a city Emergency Department.
Twenty five (36%) ambulance clinicians responded to the follow-up survey. Most felt both the pre-alert and handover components of the card were either 'useful-very useful' (n = 23 (92%); and n = 18 (72%) respectively. Nineteen (76%) used the card to record clinical information and almost all (n = 23 (92%) felt it 'useful' to 'very useful' in supporting pre-alert. Similarly, 65% (n = 16) stated they 'often' or 'always' used the card to support handover. For pre-alert information there were improvements in the provision of 8/11 (72.7%) clinical variables. Results from the post-test survey measuring ED staff (n = 37) perceptions of handover demonstrated small (p < 0.05) improvements in handover in 3/5 domains measured.
This novel low-tech intervention was highly acceptable to ambulance clinician participants, improving their data recording and information exchange processes. However, further well conducted studies are required to test the impact of this intervention on information exchange during pre-alert and handover.
患者交接过程中的沟通不畅在国际上被公认为是相当一部分可预防死亡的根本原因。使用基于救护车的平板电脑并不总是能轻松记录交接时使用的数据,尤其是在时间紧迫的情况下。因此,护理人员开发了一些实用的变通方法(如在手套或废纸上书写)来记录这些数据。然而,这些做法可能与政策相冲突,记录的数据可能不一致、容易丢失,并且会对交接质量产生负面影响。
本研究旨在评估一种新型的、低技术干预措施在院前和急诊科环境中的预警报和交接过程中支持临床信息记录与传递的可行性和可接受性。采用简单的前后测试设计,并设置历史对照。符合条件的参与者包括一个大城市救护站的所有救护临床医生(n = 69)以及该市急诊科的所有护理和医师人员(n = 99)。
25名(36%)救护临床医生回复了随访调查。大多数人认为卡片的预警报和交接部分要么“有用 - 非常有用”(分别为n = 23(92%);和n = 18(72%))。19名(76%)使用卡片记录临床信息,几乎所有人(n = 23(92%))认为它在支持预警报方面“有用”到“非常有用”。同样,65%(n = 16)表示他们“经常”或“总是”使用卡片来支持交接。对于预警报信息,11项临床变量中的8项(72.7%)的提供情况有所改善。测量急诊科工作人员(n = 37)对交接看法的测试后调查结果显示,在测量的5个领域中的3个领域,交接有小幅(p < 0.05)改善。
这种新型的低技术干预措施受到救护临床医生参与者的高度认可,改善了他们的数据记录和信息交换流程。然而,需要进一步开展精心设计的研究来测试这种干预措施对预警报和交接期间信息交换的影响。