Corral-Gudino Luis, García-Zamalloa Alberto, Prada-González Cristina, Bielsa Silvia, Alexis Duckens, Taboada-Gómez Jorge, Dos-Santos-Gallego Pilar R, Alonso-Fernández María A, Porcel Jose M
Department of Internal Medicine, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital El Bierzo, Calle Médicos sin Fronteras, 7, CP: 24404, Ponferrada, León, Spain.
RETICEF, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain.
Lung. 2016 Oct;194(5):847-54. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9923-y. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
The frequency of "complicated" pleural effusions (CPE) (i.e., pleural fluid pH ≤ 7.2 and/or glucose ≤60 mg/dL) of tuberculous origin (CTPE) is not well reported. This study aims to quantify their prevalence, and develop a score to differentiate CTPE from complicated parapneumonic effusions (CPPE).
Retrospective analysis of databases from three Spanish hospitals which included patients with CTPE and CPPE. Forty percent of the study population served to generate a scoring system (COMPLES, COMplicated PLeural Effusion Score) that was further validated in the remaining 60 %.
During the study period (1992-2015) 549 patients were diagnosed with tuberculous effusions and 434 parapneumonic effusions, of whom 25 and 64 %, respectively, had CPE. COMPLES was based on the combination of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA), the percentage of mononuclear cells (MNC %), pH, and age. The cutoff values and assigned scores were: ADA (<46 IU/L [0 points], 46-100 IU/L [4 points], ≥100 IU/L [6 points]), MNC % (<10 % [0 points], 10-50 [3 points], >50 [8 points]), pH (<7.07 [0 points], 7.07-7.20 [3 points], >7.20 [5 points]), and age (≥30 [0 points], <30 years [3 points]). A sum of 12 or more points had 97 % sensitivity, 92 % specificity, likelihood ratio positive 12.3, likelihood ratio negative 0.03, and area under the curve of 0.947 for identifying CTPE versus CPPE in the validation set.
CPE is not an unusual presentation of tuberculosis. A simple new scoring system provides a reliable tool for differentiating between CTPE and CPPE.
结核性“复杂性”胸腔积液(CPE)(即胸腔积液pH≤7.2和/或葡萄糖≤60mg/dL)(CTPE)的发生率报道较少。本研究旨在量化其患病率,并制定一个评分系统以区分CTPE与复杂性类肺炎性胸腔积液(CPPE)。
对来自三家西班牙医院数据库的患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者包括CTPE和CPPE患者。40%的研究人群用于生成一个评分系统(COMPLES,复杂性胸腔积液评分),并在其余60%的人群中进一步验证。
在研究期间(1992 - 2015年),549例患者被诊断为结核性胸腔积液,434例为类肺炎性胸腔积液,其中分别有25%和64%的患者出现CPE。COMPLES基于胸腔积液腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、单核细胞百分比(MNC%)、pH和年龄的组合。临界值和赋分如下:ADA(<46IU/L[0分],46 - 100IU/L[4分],≥100IU/L[6分]),MNC%(<10%[0分],10 - 50[3分],>50[8分]),pH(<7.07[0分],7.07 - 7.20[3分],>7.20[5分]),年龄(≥30[0分],<30岁[3分])。在验证组中,总分12分及以上对于鉴别CTPE与CPPE的敏感性为97%,特异性为92%,阳性似然比为12.3,阴性似然比为0.03,曲线下面积为0.947。
CPE并非结核病的罕见表现。一个简单的新评分系统为区分CTPE和CPPE提供了可靠的工具。