Suppr超能文献

用于鉴别低胸膜pH值或葡萄糖的结核性胸腔积液与复杂性类肺炎性胸腔积液的COMPLES评分的开发与验证

Development and Validation of the COMPLES Score for Differentiating Between Tuberculous Effusions with Low Pleural pH or Glucose and Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions.

作者信息

Corral-Gudino Luis, García-Zamalloa Alberto, Prada-González Cristina, Bielsa Silvia, Alexis Duckens, Taboada-Gómez Jorge, Dos-Santos-Gallego Pilar R, Alonso-Fernández María A, Porcel Jose M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital El Bierzo, Calle Médicos sin Fronteras, 7, CP: 24404, Ponferrada, León, Spain.

RETICEF, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Lung. 2016 Oct;194(5):847-54. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9923-y. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The frequency of "complicated" pleural effusions (CPE) (i.e., pleural fluid pH ≤ 7.2 and/or glucose ≤60 mg/dL) of tuberculous origin (CTPE) is not well reported. This study aims to quantify their prevalence, and develop a score to differentiate CTPE from complicated parapneumonic effusions (CPPE).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of databases from three Spanish hospitals which included patients with CTPE and CPPE. Forty percent of the study population served to generate a scoring system (COMPLES, COMplicated PLeural Effusion Score) that was further validated in the remaining 60 %.

RESULTS

During the study period (1992-2015) 549 patients were diagnosed with tuberculous effusions and 434 parapneumonic effusions, of whom 25 and 64 %, respectively, had CPE. COMPLES was based on the combination of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA), the percentage of mononuclear cells (MNC %), pH, and age. The cutoff values and assigned scores were: ADA (<46 IU/L [0 points], 46-100 IU/L [4 points], ≥100 IU/L [6 points]), MNC % (<10 % [0 points], 10-50 [3 points], >50 [8 points]), pH (<7.07 [0 points], 7.07-7.20 [3 points], >7.20 [5 points]), and age (≥30 [0 points], <30 years [3 points]). A sum of 12 or more points had 97 % sensitivity, 92 % specificity, likelihood ratio positive 12.3, likelihood ratio negative 0.03, and area under the curve of 0.947 for identifying CTPE versus CPPE in the validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

CPE is not an unusual presentation of tuberculosis. A simple new scoring system provides a reliable tool for differentiating between CTPE and CPPE.

摘要

背景

结核性“复杂性”胸腔积液(CPE)(即胸腔积液pH≤7.2和/或葡萄糖≤60mg/dL)(CTPE)的发生率报道较少。本研究旨在量化其患病率,并制定一个评分系统以区分CTPE与复杂性类肺炎性胸腔积液(CPPE)。

方法

对来自三家西班牙医院数据库的患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者包括CTPE和CPPE患者。40%的研究人群用于生成一个评分系统(COMPLES,复杂性胸腔积液评分),并在其余60%的人群中进一步验证。

结果

在研究期间(1992 - 2015年),549例患者被诊断为结核性胸腔积液,434例为类肺炎性胸腔积液,其中分别有25%和64%的患者出现CPE。COMPLES基于胸腔积液腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、单核细胞百分比(MNC%)、pH和年龄的组合。临界值和赋分如下:ADA(<46IU/L[0分],46 - 100IU/L[4分],≥100IU/L[6分]),MNC%(<10%[0分],10 - 50[3分],>50[8分]),pH(<7.07[0分],7.07 - 7.20[3分],>7.20[5分]),年龄(≥30[0分],<30岁[3分])。在验证组中,总分12分及以上对于鉴别CTPE与CPPE的敏感性为97%,特异性为92%,阳性似然比为12.3,阴性似然比为0.03,曲线下面积为0.947。

结论

CPE并非结核病的罕见表现。一个简单的新评分系统为区分CTPE和CPPE提供了可靠的工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验