Suppr超能文献

斜面方向对超声引导下桡动脉置管成功率的影响。

Effect of bevel direction on the success rate of ultrasound-guided radial arterial catheterization.

作者信息

Min Sung-Won, Cho Hyong-Rae, Jeon Young-Tae, Oh Ah-Young, Park Hee-Pyoung, Yang Chun Woo, Choi Woo Hee, Kim Byung-Gun

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul 11;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0202-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the effect of bevel direction on the success rate of ultrasound guided radial artery catheterization.

METHODS

A total of 204 patients requiring radial artery catheterization were randomly divided into bevel-up (n = 102) and bevel-down (n = 102) groups. Success rate, cannulation time, and number of attempts were compared groups.

RESULTS

In the bevel-down group, an arterial line was placed on the first attempt in 86 of 102 (84.3 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 76 % to 90 %) patients versus 73 of 102 (71.6 %; 95 % CI = 62.1 % to 79.4 %) in the bevel-up group (p = 0.028). In the bevel-down group, the mean time to a successful radial arterial cannulation was 33.3 ± 6.3 seconds (95 % CI = 32.1-34.6) versus 35.9 ± 7.6 seconds (95 % CI = 34.4-37.2) in the bevel-up group (p = 0.011). The median score was 33.2 and interquartile range [IQR] was 10.9 (30.3-41.2) for the mean cannulation time in the bevel-up group. In the bevel-down group, the mean score was 32.3 (IQR 3.90, 30-33.9) for mean cannulation time. In the bevel-down group, 11 of 102 (7 %; 95 % CI = 0 to 16 %) patients developed a posterior wall puncture versus 22 of 102 ((21.6 %; 95 % CI = 14.7 to 17.2 %) in the bevel-up group.

CONCLUSION

The bevel-down approach during ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization exhibited a higher success with fewer complications compared to the bevel-up approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service is Korean Clinical Trials Registry ( KCT0001836 ). It was registered retrospectively 30th Nov 2015.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了斜面方向对超声引导下桡动脉置管成功率的影响。

方法

总共204例需要进行桡动脉置管的患者被随机分为斜面向上组(n = 102)和斜面向下组(n = 102)。比较两组的成功率、置管时间和尝试次数。

结果

在斜面向下组中,102例患者中有86例(84.3%;95%置信区间[CI]=76%至90%)首次尝试即成功置入动脉导管,而斜面向上组102例患者中有73例(71.6%;95%CI = 62.1%至79.4%)(p = 0.028)。在斜面向下组中,成功进行桡动脉置管的平均时间为33.3±6.3秒(95%CI = 32.1 - 34.6),而斜面向上组为35.9±7.6秒(95%CI = 34.4 - 37.2)(p = 0.011)。斜面向上组平均置管时间的中位数为33.2,四分位间距[IQR]为10.9(30.3 - 41.2)。在斜面向下组中,平均置管时间的平均评分为32.3(IQR 3.90,30 - 33.9)。在斜面向下组中,102例患者中有11例(7%;95%CI = 0至16%)发生后壁穿刺,而斜面向上组102例患者中有22例(21.6%;95%CI = 14.7至17.2%)。

结论

与斜面向上方法相比,超声引导下桡动脉置管时采用斜面向下方法成功率更高,并发症更少。

试验注册

韩国临床试验注册中心临床研究信息服务(KCT0001836)。于2015年11月30日进行回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2cf/4939735/f9b913532b4e/12871_2016_202_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验