Subramaniam Rathan M, Shields Anthony F, Sachedina Archana, Hanna Lucy, Duan Fenghai, Siegel Barry A, Hillner Bruce E
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Oncologist. 2016 Sep;21(9):1079-84. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0364. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
We assessed the impact of [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) on intended management of patients in the National Oncologic PET Registry (NOPR) for three different diagnostic indications: (a) determining whether a suspicious lesion is cancer (Dx), (b) detecting an unknown primary tumor site when there is confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic disease (cancer of unknown primary origin [CUP]), and (c) detecting a primary tumor site when there is a presumed paraneoplastic syndrome (PNS).
We reviewed a sample of randomly selected reports of NOPR subjects who underwent PET for Dx and CUP and all reports for PNS to find subjects for analysis. For these studies, we evaluated the impact of PET on referring physicians' intended management, based on their management plans reported before and after PET.
Intended management was changed more frequently in the CUP group (43.1%) than in the Dx (23.9%) and PNS (25.4%) groups (CUP vs. Dx, p < .0001; PNS vs. Dx, p < .0001; CUP vs. PNS, p < .0002). Referring physicians reported that, in light of PET results, they were able to avoid further testing in approximately three-fourths of patients (71.8%-74.6%). At the time when the post-PET forms were completed, biopsies of suspicious sites had been performed in 21.2%, 32.4%, and 23.2%, respectively, of Dx, CUP, and PNS cases.
Our analysis of NOPR data shows that PET appears to have a substantial impact on intended management when used for three common diagnostic indications.
[(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography appears to have a substantial impact on intended management when used for three targeted diagnostic indications: (a) determining whether a suspicious lesion is cancer, (b) detecting an unknown primary tumor site in a patient with confirmed or strongly suspected metastatic disease, and (c) detecting a primary tumor site in a patient with a presumed paraneoplastic syndrome.
我们评估了[(18)F] - 氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG) - 正电子发射断层扫描(PET)对国家肿瘤PET登记处(NOPR)中患者预期管理的影响,涉及三种不同的诊断指征:(a)确定可疑病变是否为癌症(诊断),(b)在确诊或高度怀疑有转移性疾病(原发灶不明的癌症[CUP])时检测未知的原发肿瘤部位,以及(c)在存在假定的副肿瘤综合征(PNS)时检测原发肿瘤部位。
我们回顾了随机选择的接受PET检查用于诊断和CUP的NOPR受试者报告样本,以及所有用于PNS的报告,以寻找进行分析的受试者。对于这些研究,我们根据PET检查前后报告的管理计划,评估了PET对转诊医生预期管理的影响。
CUP组(43.1%)的预期管理改变频率高于诊断组(23.9%)和PNS组(25.4%)(CUP与诊断组相比,p <.0001;PNS与诊断组相比,p <.0001;CUP与PNS相比,p <.0002)。转诊医生报告称,根据PET结果,他们能够在大约四分之三的患者(71.8% - 74.6%)中避免进一步检查。在完成PET检查后的表格填写时,诊断组、CUP组和PNS组分别有21.2%、32.4%和23.2%的可疑部位进行了活检。
我们对NOPR数据的分析表明,PET用于三种常见诊断指征时,似乎对预期管理有重大影响。
[(18)F] - 氟脱氧葡萄糖 - 正电子发射断层扫描用于三种靶向诊断指征时,似乎对预期管理有重大影响:(a)确定可疑病变是否为癌症,(b)在确诊或高度怀疑有转移性疾病的患者中检测未知的原发肿瘤部位,以及(c)在存在假定的副肿瘤综合征的患者中检测原发肿瘤部位。