• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合药代动力学-药效学模型以评估腹部手术中的抗菌预防措施。

Integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to evaluate antimicrobial prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Zelenitsky S A, Lawson C, Calic D, Ariano R E, Roberts J A, Lipman J, Zhanel G G

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Department of Pharmacy, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Oct;71(10):2902-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw247. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkw247
PMID:27402005
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To use Monte Carlo simulation with an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to evaluate guideline-recommended antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) regimens with anaerobic coverage in abdominal surgery.

METHODS

AP regimens were tested in simulated subjects undergoing elective abdominal surgery using relevant PK models and pathogen distributions in surgical site infections (SSIs). Predicted cumulative target attainment was the percentage of simulated subjects with free (unbound) antimicrobial plasma concentrations above the MICs for potential SSI pathogens.

RESULTS

Cefazolin plus metronidazole covered SSI aerobes in 70% and the Bacteroides fragilis group in 99% of subjects, whereas cefoxitin only covered aerobes and anaerobes in 63% and 27% of cases, respectively. The broad-spectrum ceftriaxone plus metronidazole covered aerobes in 82% and anaerobes in 99% of simulations, while ertapenem covered aerobes in 88% and anaerobes in 90% of cases. Clindamycin covered the B. fragilis group in only 11% of cases. For cefazolin, 2 g doses maintained target attainment in simulated subjects from 80 to 120 kg, whereas 1 g doses were associated with lower target attainment against potential Gram-negative pathogens even in those <80 kg. For gentamicin, 3 mg/kg doses were comparable to the suggested 5 mg/kg, but superior to the traditional 1.5 mg/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the use of PK-PD to inform decisions regarding AP in abdominal surgery. In this case, the findings support avoiding cefoxitin, avoiding clindamycin for anaerobic coverage, selecting 2 g doses of cefazolin even in patients <80 kg and using 3 mg/kg doses of gentamicin.

摘要

目的

使用蒙特卡罗模拟结合整合的药代动力学-药效学(PK-PD)模型,评估腹部手术中具有厌氧菌覆盖的指南推荐抗菌预防(AP)方案。

方法

使用相关的PK模型和手术部位感染(SSI)中的病原体分布,在接受择期腹部手术的模拟受试者中测试AP方案。预测的累积目标达成率是指模拟受试者中游离(未结合)抗菌药物血浆浓度高于潜在SSI病原体的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的百分比。

结果

头孢唑林加甲硝唑在70%的受试者中覆盖了SSI需氧菌,在99%的受试者中覆盖了脆弱拟杆菌群,而头孢西丁仅分别在63%和27%的病例中覆盖了需氧菌和厌氧菌。广谱头孢曲松加甲硝唑在82%的模拟中覆盖了需氧菌,在99%的模拟中覆盖了厌氧菌,而厄他培南在88%的病例中覆盖了需氧菌,在90%的病例中覆盖了厌氧菌。克林霉素仅在11%的病例中覆盖了脆弱拟杆菌群。对于头孢唑林,2 g剂量在80至120 kg的模拟受试者中维持了目标达成率,而1 g剂量即使在体重<80 kg的受试者中,针对潜在革兰氏阴性病原体的目标达成率也较低。对于庆大霉素,3 mg/kg剂量与建议的5 mg/kg相当,但优于传统的1.5 mg/kg。

结论

本研究证明了使用PK-PD为腹部手术中AP的决策提供依据。在这种情况下,研究结果支持避免使用头孢西丁,避免使用克林霉素进行厌氧菌覆盖,即使在体重<80 kg的患者中也选择2 g剂量的头孢唑林,并使用3 mg/kg剂量的庆大霉素。

相似文献

1
Integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to evaluate antimicrobial prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.整合药代动力学-药效学模型以评估腹部手术中的抗菌预防措施。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Oct;71(10):2902-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw247. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
2
Pharmacodynamic modelling of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.择期结直肠手术中静脉抗生素预防的药效学模型。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013 Feb;41(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.09.017. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
3
Reassessing the dosing of cefoxitin prophylaxis during major abdominal surgery: insights from microdialysis and population pharmacokinetic modelling.重新评估大腹部手术期间头孢西丁预防剂量:来自微透析和群体药代动力学模型的见解。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jul 1;74(7):1975-1983. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz139.
4
Pharmacodynamic model for β-lactam regimens used in surgical prophylaxis: model-based evaluation of standard dosing regimens.用于外科手术预防的β-内酰胺类给药方案的药效学模型:基于模型的标准给药方案评估
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1059-1071. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0720-y. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
5
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients.头孢西丁基于体重给药方案用于肥胖和病态肥胖患者围手术期手术预防的药代动力学和药效学评价
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):5885-93. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00585-16. Print 2016 Oct.
6
Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation of varying doses of intravenous metronidazole.不同剂量静脉注射甲硝唑的群体药代动力学建模与蒙特卡洛模拟
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Aug;55(4):303-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.013.
7
Ertapenem prophylaxis of surgical site infections in elective colorectal surgery in China: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study.厄他培南预防中国择期结直肠手术手术部位感染的多中心、随机、双盲、阳性药物对照研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Dec;69(12):3379-86. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku302. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
8
Use and Effectiveness of Peri-Operative Cefotetan versus Cefazolin Plus Metronidazole for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Abdominal Surgery Patients.围手术期使用头孢替坦与头孢唑林加甲硝唑预防腹部手术患者手术部位感染的应用及有效性
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 May/Jun;19(4):388-396. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.010. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
9
Antibiotic regimen and the timing of prophylaxis are important for reducing surgical site infection after elective abdominal colorectal surgery.抗生素方案和预防时机对于降低择期腹部结直肠手术后手术部位感染很重要。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Aug;12(4):255-60. doi: 10.1089/sur.2010.073. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
10
Perioperative Antibiotic Selection and Surgical Site Infection in Elective Colon Surgery.择期结肠手术围手术期抗生素的选择与手术部位感染
Am Surg. 2020 Sep;86(9):1091-1093. doi: 10.1177/0003134820943567. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing intermittent cefoxitin administration versus loading bolus followed by continuous infusion for the prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: the PROPHYLOXITIN study protocol.多中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验:比较间歇性头孢西丁给药与负荷剂量推注后持续输注用于预防结直肠手术手术部位感染的效果——PROPHYLOXITIN研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e088306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088306.
2
Dosing Cefazolin for Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: Intermittent Bolus or Continuous Infusion?-A Pilot Study.青少年特发性脊柱侧弯手术中头孢唑林预防手术部位感染的给药方式:间歇推注还是持续输注?-一项初步研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 16;13(12):3524. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123524.
3
Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment analysis of cefazolin using total and unbound serum concentration in patients with prostatectomy or nephrectomy.前列腺切除术或肾切除术患者的头孢唑林总血清浓度和游离血清浓度的群体药代动力学和药效学目标分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Jul 9;68(7):e0026724. doi: 10.1128/aac.00267-24. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Megaprosthetic Reconstructions: Drug and Dosing May Matter More than Duration.大型假体重建的抗生素预防:药物和剂量可能比持续时间更重要。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Oct 18;66(10):e0014022. doi: 10.1128/aac.00140-22. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
5
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Intraoperative Cefazolin Concentrations and Sternal Wound Infections.心脏手术患者的抗菌预防:术中头孢唑啉浓度与胸骨伤口感染。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Oct 24;62(11). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01360-18. Print 2018 Nov.