Suppr超能文献

择期结肠手术围手术期抗生素的选择与手术部位感染

Perioperative Antibiotic Selection and Surgical Site Infection in Elective Colon Surgery.

作者信息

Aziz Madiha, Beale Jack, Sheehan Brynn, Bandy Nicholas, Martyak Michael

机构信息

General Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.

EVMS-Sentara Healthcare Analytics and Delivery Science Institute (HADSI), Norfolk, VA, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2020 Sep;86(9):1091-1093. doi: 10.1177/0003134820943567. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The highest rates of surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with colorectal operations (up to 30%). A sentinel paper showed that the use of intravenous (IV) cefazolin and metronidazole was associated with decreased rates of SSI compared with cefoxitin (6% vs 13%). We reviewed the association of SSI with prophylactic antibiotic choice. We specifically investigated the regimens of ceftriaxone and metronidazole IV, cefoxitin IV, or ertapenem.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 532 colon surgeries between 2016 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were patients 18-89 years of age undergoing elective colon surgery who received ceftriaxone/metronidazole, cefoxitin, or ertapenem for prophylaxis. All emergent cases were excluded. This resulted in 241 elective colon cases for review. The primary endpoint was to determine if the use of ceftriaxone/metronidazole decreased the rate of SSI.

RESULTS

In total, there were 241 elective colon cases with 21 SSI. We compared SSI rates in the ceftriaxone/metronidazole group to those patients receiving either cefoxitin or ertapenem (4.5% vs 12.2%; = .035). We then compared SSI in ceftriaxone/metronidazole to SSI in cefoxitin (4.5% vs 10%; = .13). Finally, we compared SSI in the ceftriaxone/metronidazole group to SSI in the ertapenem group (4.5% vs 14%; = .03). Comorbidities and underlying factors were similar across all antibiotic groups.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, the use of ceftriaxone/metronidazole is associated with a decreased SSI rate. Furthermore, ceftriaxone/metronidazole use is superior to the use of ertapenem, with a trend toward superiority over cefoxitin. Based on this study, we recommend ceftriaxone/metronidazole as antibiotic prophylaxis for elective colon surgery.

摘要

目的

手术部位感染(SSI)发生率最高与结直肠手术相关(高达30%)。一篇标志性论文表明,与头孢西丁相比,静脉注射(IV)头孢唑林和甲硝唑可降低SSI发生率(6%对13%)。我们回顾了SSI与预防性抗生素选择之间的关联。我们特别研究了头孢曲松和甲硝唑静脉注射、头孢西丁静脉注射或厄他培南的方案。

方法

我们对2016年至2018年间的532例结肠手术进行了回顾性研究。纳入标准为年龄在18 - 89岁之间接受择期结肠手术且接受头孢曲松/甲硝唑、头孢西丁或厄他培南预防性治疗的患者。所有急诊病例均被排除。这导致241例择期结肠病例可供审查。主要终点是确定使用头孢曲松/甲硝唑是否能降低SSI发生率。

结果

总共241例择期结肠病例中有21例发生SSI。我们将头孢曲松/甲硝唑组的SSI发生率与接受头孢西丁或厄他培南的患者进行比较(4.5%对12.2%;P = 0.035)。然后我们将头孢曲松/甲硝唑组的SSI发生率与头孢西丁组进行比较(4.5%对10%;P = 0.13)。最后,我们将头孢曲松/甲硝唑组的SSI发生率与厄他培南组进行比较(4.5%对14%;P = 0.03)。所有抗生素组的合并症和潜在因素相似。

结论

根据我们的经验,使用头孢曲松/甲硝唑与降低SSI发生率相关。此外,使用头孢曲松/甲硝唑优于使用厄他培南,且有优于头孢西丁的趋势。基于本研究,我们推荐头孢曲松/甲硝唑作为择期结肠手术的抗生素预防性用药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验