• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,ADP诱导的血小板-纤维蛋白凝块强度与抗血小板反应性之间的关系。

Relationship between ADP-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength and anti-platelet responsiveness in ticagrelor treated ACS patients.

作者信息

Li Dan-Dan, Wang Xu-Yun, Xi Shao-Zhi, Liu Jia, Qin Liu-An, Jing Jing, Yin Tong, Chen Yun-Dai

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing China.

出版信息

J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 May;13(4):282-9. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.04.012.

DOI:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.04.012
PMID:27403136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4921539/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor provides enhanced antiplatelet efficacy but increased risk of bleeding and dyspnea. This study aimed to display the relationship between ADP-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (MAADP) and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated by ticagrelor.

METHODS

Consecutive Chinese-Han patients with ACS who received maintenance dose of ticagrelor on top of aspirin were recruited. After 5-day ticagrelor maintenance treatment, MAADP measured by thrombelastography (TEG) were recorded for the evaluation of ticagrelor anti-platelet reactivity. Pre-specified cutoffs of MAADP > 47 mm for high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) and MAADP < 31 mm for low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) were applied for evaluation. The occurrences of primary ischemic cardiovascular events (including a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke), the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) defined bleeding events, and ticagrelor related dyspnea were recorded after a follow-up of three months.

RESULTS

Overall, 176 ACS patients (Male: 79.55%, Age: 59.91 ± 10.54 years) under ticagrelor maintenance treatment were recruited. The value of MAADP ranged from 4.80% to 72.90% (21.27% ± 12.07% on average), with the distribution higher skewed towards the lower values. Using the pre-specific cutoffs for HTPR and LTPR, seven patients (3.98%) were identified as HTPR and 144 patients (81.82%) as LTPR. After a follow-up of three months in 172 patients, major cardiovascular events occurred in no patient, but TIMI bleeding events in 81 (47.09%) with major bleedings in three patients. All patients with major bleedings were classified as LTPR. Ticagrelor related dyspnea occurred in 31 (18.02%) patients, with 30 (21.28%) classified as LTPR and no one as HTPR (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In ticagrelor treated ACS patients, MAADP measured by TEG might be valuable for the prediction of major bleeding and ticagrelor related dyspnea. Due to the small number of patients with HTPR after ticagrelor maintenance treatment, larger scale study should be warranted to verify the relationship between MAADP defined HTPR and ticagrelor related ischemic events.

摘要

背景

替格瑞洛具有更强的抗血小板疗效,但出血和呼吸困难风险增加。本研究旨在揭示在接受替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者中,ADP诱导的血小板-纤维蛋白凝块强度(MAADP)与临床结局之间的关系。

方法

招募连续的中国汉族ACS患者,这些患者在阿司匹林基础上接受替格瑞洛维持剂量治疗。在替格瑞洛维持治疗5天后,记录通过血栓弹力图(TEG)测量的MAADP,以评估替格瑞洛的抗血小板反应性。应用预先设定的MAADP>47mm为高治疗期血小板反应性(HTPR)、MAADP<31mm为低治疗期血小板反应性(LTPR)的临界值进行评估。在随访3个月后,记录主要缺血性心血管事件(包括心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和中风的复合事件)、心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)定义的出血事件以及与替格瑞洛相关的呼吸困难的发生情况。

结果

总体而言,共招募了176例接受替格瑞洛维持治疗的ACS患者(男性:79.55%,年龄:59.91±10.54岁)。MAADP值范围为4.80%至72.90%(平均为21.27%±12.07%),分布更偏向较低值。使用针对HTPR和LTPR的预先设定临界值,7例患者(3.98%)被确定为HTPR,144例患者(81.82%)为LTPR。在172例患者随访3个月后,无患者发生主要心血管事件,但81例患者(47.09%)发生TIMI出血事件,其中3例患者发生大出血。所有大出血患者均被归类为LTPR。31例患者(18.02%)发生与替格瑞洛相关的呼吸困难,其中30例(21.28%)被归类为LTPR,无HTPR患者(P=0.02)。

结论

在接受替格瑞洛治疗的ACS患者中,通过TEG测量的MAADP可能对预测大出血和与替格瑞洛相关的呼吸困难有价值。由于替格瑞洛维持治疗后HTPR患者数量较少,需要更大规模的研究来验证MAADP定义的HTPR与替格瑞洛相关缺血事件之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9855/4921539/c3a2ff2fdb40/jgc-13-04-282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9855/4921539/c3a2ff2fdb40/jgc-13-04-282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9855/4921539/c3a2ff2fdb40/jgc-13-04-282-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Relationship between ADP-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength and anti-platelet responsiveness in ticagrelor treated ACS patients.替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,ADP诱导的血小板-纤维蛋白凝块强度与抗血小板反应性之间的关系。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 May;13(4):282-9. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.04.012.
2
Impact of Prasugrel and Ticagrelor on Platelet Reactivity in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.普拉格雷和替格瑞洛对急性冠状动脉综合征患者血小板反应性的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 9;9:905607. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.905607. eCollection 2022.
3
[Effect of platelet reactivity on clinical events in patients using bivalirudin in selective percutaneous coronary intervention].[血小板反应性对接受比伐卢定选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床事件的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 24;49(8):783-789. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20210106-00014.
4
Platelet reactivity evaluated with the VASP assay following ticagrelor loading dose in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者负荷剂量替格瑞洛后用 VASP 检测血小板反应性。
Thromb Res. 2013 Jul;132(1):e15-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 30.
5
Platelet-fibrin clot strength measured by thromboelastography could predict hypercoagulability and antiplatelet effects in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.通过血栓弹力图测量的血小板-纤维蛋白凝块强度可预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者的高凝状态和抗血小板效果。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;10(3):2448-2457. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1728. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
6
Residual platelet reactivity is preferred over platelet inhibition rate in monitoring antiplatelet efficacy: insights using thrombelastography.监测抗血小板疗效时,血小板反应残留优于血小板抑制率:血栓弹力图的见解。
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020 Feb;41(2):192-197. doi: 10.1038/s41401-019-0278-9. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
7
Platelet reactivity patterns in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy.接受双重抗血小板治疗患者的血小板反应性模式
Eur J Clin Invest. 2019 Jun;49(6):e13102. doi: 10.1111/eci.13102. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
Net platelet clot strength of thromboelastography platelet mapping assay for the identification of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in post-PCI patients.血栓弹力描记术血小板图检测血小板网络凝块强度对 PCI 术后高血小板反应患者的识别。
Biosci Rep. 2020 Jul 31;40(7). doi: 10.1042/BSR20201346.
9
Prediction of residual ischemic risk in ticagrelor-treated patients with acute coronary syndrome.替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者残余缺血风险的预测
Thromb J. 2022 Apr 21;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12959-022-00380-4.
10
Benefit of Switching Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome According to On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity: The TOPIC-VASP Pre-Specified Analysis of the TOPIC Randomized Study.根据治疗中的血小板反应性评估,急性冠状动脉综合征后转换双联抗血小板治疗的获益:TOPIC-VASP 预先指定分析,TOPIC 随机研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 26;10(24):2560-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.044.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibodies on Platelet Reactivity and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Receiving Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9单克隆抗体对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血小板反应性及心血管事件的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Jan 15. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00719-4.
2
Resistance on the Latest Oral and Intravenous P2Y12 ADP Receptor Blockers in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Fact or Myth?急性冠状动脉综合征患者对最新口服和静脉用P2Y12 ADP受体阻滞剂的耐药性:事实还是误解?
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 4;11(23):7211. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237211.
3

本文引用的文献

1
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
2
Prevalence and predictors of high-on treatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor in ACS patients undergoing stent implantation.接受支架植入的急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用替格瑞洛治疗时高血小板反应性的患病率及预测因素
Vascul Pharmacol. 2016 Feb;77:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 May 6.
3
Changes in platelet function and coagulation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation evaluated with thromboelastography.
经食道超声心动图评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术后血小板功能和凝血的变化。
Open Heart. 2022 Nov;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002132.
4
Comparison between thromboelastography and the conventional coagulation test in detecting effects of antiplatelet agents after endovascular treatments in acute ischemic stroke patients: A STROBE-compliant study.急性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗后血栓弹力图与传统凝血试验检测抗血小板药物疗效的比较:一项遵循STROBE标准的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(10):e19447. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019447.
5
Lifetime cardiovascular management of patients with previous Kawasaki disease.川崎病既往患者的终生心血管管理。
Heart. 2020 Mar;106(6):411-420. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315925. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
Selection of P2Y12 antagonist, treatment initiation, and predictors of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in a "Real World" registry.“真实世界”登记研究中P2Y12拮抗剂的选择、治疗起始及治疗期间高血小板反应性的预测因素
Thromb Res. 2015 Jun;135(6):1093-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
High on-treatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor versus prasugrel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷治疗时的血小板高反应性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jun;13(6):931-42. doi: 10.1111/jth.12907. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
5
Ticagrelor versus high dose clopidogrel in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with high platelet reactivity post fibrinolysis.替格瑞洛与高剂量氯吡格雷用于溶栓后血小板高反应性的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的比较
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Oct;40(3):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1183-9.
6
Relation between ticagrelor response and levels of circulating reticulated platelets in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.替格瑞洛反应与非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者循环中网织血小板水平的关系。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Aug;40(2):211-7. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1178-6.
7
Dyspnoea management in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with ticagrelor.替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者的呼吸困难管理
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015 Dec;4(6):555-60. doi: 10.1177/2048872614554108. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
8
Platelet reactivity during ticagrelor maintenance therapy: a patient-level data meta-analysis.替格瑞洛维持治疗期间的血小板反应性:一项患者水平数据的荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.026. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
9
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):2354-94. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000133. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
10
Comparison of platelet inhibition by prasugrel versus ticagrelor over time in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者中普拉格雷与替格瑞洛随时间推移的血小板抑制作用比较。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2015 Jan;39(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11239-014-1119-9.