Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Ministry of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 12;6:29298. doi: 10.1038/srep29298.
To assess the role of sex mismatch on graft survival after pancreas transplantation. We evaluated 24,195 pancreas-transplant recipients reported in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients over a 25-year period. Pancreatic graft survival (PGS) was analyzed according to donor-recipient sex pairing using Kaplan-Meier estimations. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 14,187 male and 10,008 female recipients were included in final analyses. Mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.7 years. In multivariate analyses, neither recipient sex nor donor sex was associated with pancreatic graft failure (PGF), but donor-recipient sex mismatch (regardless of recipient sex) was an independent predictor of PGS (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14; p < 0.001). Compared with M → M sex-matched recipients in univariate analyses, M → F and F → M sex mismatches were associated with an increased risk of PGF. Adjustment for significant recipient and donor factors eliminated the association between F → M sex mismatch and PGF (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10; p = 0.752), but not M → F (1.09; 1.02-1.17; 0.020). Stratified analyses suggested that the negative effect of donor-recipient sex mismatch could be neutralized in older patients. These findings suggest that donor-recipient sex pairing should be taken into consideration in organ-allocation strategies.
为了评估胰腺移植后移植物存活率的性别不匹配作用。我们评估了在 25 年内报告给移植受者科学登记处的 24195 例胰腺移植受者。根据供受者性别配对,使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计分析胰腺移植物存活率(PGS)。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计风险比。共有 14187 名男性和 10008 名女性受者纳入最终分析。平均随访时间为 8.3±5.7 年。多变量分析中,受者性别和供者性别均与胰腺移植物衰竭(PGF)无关,但供受者性别不匹配(无论受者性别如何)是 PGS 的独立预测因素(HR,1.09;95%CI,1.04-1.14;p<0.001)。与单变量分析中的 M→M 性别匹配受者相比,M→F 和 F→M 性别不匹配与 PGF 的风险增加相关。调整显著的受者和供者因素消除了 F→M 性别不匹配与 PGF 之间的关联(HR,1.02;95%CI,0.93-1.10;p=0.752),但不是 M→F(1.09;1.02-1.17;0.020)。分层分析表明,供受者性别不匹配的负面影响在老年患者中可能会被中和。这些发现表明,在器官分配策略中应考虑供受者性别配对。