Suppr超能文献

抑郁亚型的血清蛋白质组图谱。

Serum proteomic profiles of depressive subtypes.

作者信息

Lamers F, Bot M, Jansen R, Chan M K, Cooper J D, Bahn S, Penninx B W J H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Transl Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e851. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.115.

Abstract

Depression is a highly heterogeneous disorder. Accumulating evidence suggests biological and genetic differences between subtypes of depression that are homogeneous in symptom presentation. We aimed to evaluate differences in serum protein profiles between persons with atypical and melancholic depressive subtypes, and compare these profiles with serum protein levels of healthy controls. We used the baseline data from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety on 414 controls, 231 persons with a melancholic depressive subtype and 128 persons with an atypical depressive subtype for whom the proteomic data were available. Depressive subtypes were previously established using a data-driven analysis, and 171 serum proteins were measured on a multi-analyte profiling platform. Linear regression models were adjusted for several covariates and corrected for multiple testing using false discovery rate q-values. We observed differences in analytes between the atypical and melancholic subtypes (9 analytes, q<0.05) and between atypical depression and controls (23 analytes, q<0.05). Eight of the nine markers differing between the atypical and melancholic subtype overlapped with markers from the comparison between atypical subtype and controls (mesothelin, leptin, IGFBP1, IGFBP2, FABPa, insulin, C3 and B2M), and were mainly involved in cellular communication and signal transduction, and immune response. No markers differed significantly between the melancholic subtype and controls. To conclude, although some uncertainties exist in our results as a result of missing data imputation and lack of proteomic replication samples, many of the identified analytes are inflammatory or metabolic markers, which supports the notion of atypical depression as a syndrome characterized by metabolic disturbances and inflammation, and underline the importance and relevance of subtypes of depression in biological and genetic research, and potentially in the treatment of depression.

摘要

抑郁症是一种高度异质性的疾病。越来越多的证据表明,在症状表现上具有同质性的抑郁症亚型之间存在生物学和遗传差异。我们旨在评估非典型性抑郁症亚型和忧郁性抑郁症亚型患者血清蛋白谱的差异,并将这些谱与健康对照者的血清蛋白水平进行比较。我们使用了荷兰抑郁症与焦虑症研究的基线数据,该数据来自414名对照者、231名患有忧郁性抑郁症亚型的患者以及128名患有非典型性抑郁症亚型且有蛋白质组学数据的患者。抑郁症亚型先前是通过数据驱动分析确定的,并且在多分析物检测平台上测量了171种血清蛋白。线性回归模型针对多个协变量进行了调整,并使用错误发现率q值对多重检验进行了校正。我们观察到非典型性抑郁症亚型和忧郁性抑郁症亚型之间的分析物存在差异(9种分析物,q<0.05),非典型性抑郁症与对照者之间也存在差异(23种分析物,q<0.05)。非典型性抑郁症亚型和忧郁性抑郁症亚型之间不同的9种标志物中有8种与非典型性抑郁症亚型和对照者之间比较的标志物重叠(间皮素、瘦素、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白1、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白2、脂肪酸结合蛋白a、胰岛素、补体C3和β2微球蛋白),并且主要参与细胞通讯和信号转导以及免疫反应。忧郁性抑郁症亚型与对照者之间没有标志物存在显著差异。总之,尽管由于数据缺失插补和缺乏蛋白质组学重复样本,我们的结果存在一些不确定性,但许多已鉴定的分析物是炎症或代谢标志物,这支持了非典型性抑郁症是一种以代谢紊乱和炎症为特征的综合征的观点,并强调了抑郁症亚型在生物学和遗传学研究以及潜在的抑郁症治疗中的重要性和相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3f1/5545705/e308be4260a7/tp2016115f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验