Tianjin Mental Health Institute, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China; University Centre of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, Research School Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences (BCN), Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Centre of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Psychosom Res. 2018 Aug;111:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 14.
The current diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) do not allow prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response. A possible strategy to improve this situation is the identification of depression subtypes on the bases of biomarkers reflecting underlying pathological processes such as neuro-inflammation.
The PubMed/Medline database was searched until Apr 25th, 2017. In the initial search 1018 articles were retrieved, which were subsequently screened and only selected when the inclusion and exclusion criteria were fulfilled.
Eight eligible studies were found. Overall, serum interleukin-6 and 1β values were increased in the melancholic MDD subtype compared to controls and the non-melancholic MDD subtype. C-reactive protein was increased in non-melancholic MDD in 2 out of 4 studies, while there was no difference for tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-2 and 10.
Given the paucity of eligible studies the tentative conclusion must be drawn that peripheral inflammation markers have limited added value thus far to distinguish between melancholic and non-melancholic depression. To allow for a more definitive conclusion, further research is warranted using a broader panel of inflammatory markers in MDD subtypes, preferably based on a general consensus regarding diagnostic criteria and subtype definitions.
目前的重性抑郁障碍(MDD)诊断标准不能预测预后和治疗反应。一种可能的策略是基于反映潜在病理过程的生物标志物(如神经炎症)来识别抑郁亚型。
检索了截至 2017 年 4 月 25 日的 PubMed/Medline 数据库。在最初的搜索中,检索到 1018 篇文章,随后进行了筛选,只有符合纳入和排除标准的文章才被选中。
共发现 8 项符合条件的研究。总的来说,与对照组和非忧郁性 MDD 亚型相比,忧郁性 MDD 亚型的血清白细胞介素-6 和 1β 值升高。4 项研究中有 2 项显示非忧郁性 MDD 中的 C 反应蛋白升高,而肿瘤坏死因子-α、白细胞介素-2 和 10 则没有差异。
鉴于合格研究的数量有限,目前只能得出这样的结论,即外周炎症标志物在区分忧郁性和非忧郁性抑郁方面的附加价值有限。为了得出更明确的结论,有必要在 MDD 亚型中使用更广泛的炎症标志物面板进行进一步研究,最好是基于对诊断标准和亚型定义的普遍共识。