• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克林霉素两种不同给药方案的评估及其在人体阑尾中的渗透情况。

Evaluation of two different dosage regimens of clindamycin and the penetration into human appendix.

作者信息

Chin A, Gill M A, Ito M K, Yellin A E, Berne T V, Heseltine P N, Appleman M D, Chenella F C

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles County.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 1989;11(4):421-4.

PMID:2741191
Abstract

The study objective was to evaluate serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue concentrations of clindamycin using two differing clindamycin regimens. Patients age 16 years and older who were about to undergo appendectomies were randomly assigned to receive gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg every 8 h admixed with clindamycin 900 mg every 8 h (8-h group) or clindamycin 600 mg every 6 h given separately (6-h group). Doses of each regimen were given preoperatively. Serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue samples were obtained intraoperatively, and frozen at -70 degrees C for gas chromatographic drug analysis. Twenty-one patients were evaluated, 11 patients in the 8-h group and 10 patients in the 6-h group. Values are reported as means +/- standard deviations. The values in the 8-h group were 12.3 +/- 14.1 micrograms/ml, 8.7 +/- 3.9 micrograms/ml, and 9.8 +/- 10.3 micrograms/g for serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue, respectively. The values in the 6-h group were 9.7 +/- 5.1 micrograms/ml, 5.8 +/- 5.3 micrograms/ml, and 6.2 +/- 4.9 micrograms/g for serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue, respectively. The 6-h group received more doses preoperatively (1.8 +/- 0.6) than the 8-h group (1.2 +/- 0.4; p less than 0.05). No differences in penetration of clindamycin into the serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue for the 8-h group and the 6-h group were noted. The study revealed a similarity in penetration of clindamycin into the serum, peritoneal fluid, and appendix tissue using either clindamycin 900 mg given by intermittent intravenous infusion every 8 h admixed with gentamicin or clindamycin 600 mg given every 6-h separately.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用两种不同的克林霉素给药方案,评估血清、腹腔液和阑尾组织中克林霉素的浓度。16岁及以上即将接受阑尾切除术的患者被随机分配,每8小时接受1.5mg/kg庆大霉素与每8小时900mg克林霉素混合给药(8小时组),或每6小时单独给予600mg克林霉素(6小时组)。每种方案的剂量均在术前给予。术中采集血清、腹腔液和阑尾组织样本,并在-70℃冷冻,用于气相色谱药物分析。共评估了21例患者,8小时组11例,6小时组10例。数值以平均值±标准差表示。8小时组血清、腹腔液和阑尾组织中的数值分别为12.3±14.1μg/ml、8.7±3.9μg/ml和9.8±10.3μg/g。6小时组血清、腹腔液和阑尾组织中的数值分别为9.7±5.1μg/ml、5.8±5.3μg/ml和6.2±4.9μg/g。6小时组术前接受的剂量(1.8±0.6)比8小时组(1.2±0.4)多(p<0.05)。8小时组和6小时组在克林霉素渗透到血清、腹腔液和阑尾组织方面未发现差异。该研究表明,每8小时间歇静脉输注900mg克林霉素与庆大霉素混合使用,或每6小时单独给予600mg克林霉素,在克林霉素渗透到血清、腹腔液和阑尾组织方面具有相似性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of two different dosage regimens of clindamycin and the penetration into human appendix.克林霉素两种不同给药方案的评估及其在人体阑尾中的渗透情况。
Ther Drug Monit. 1989;11(4):421-4.
2
Analysis of cefepime tissue penetration into human appendix.
Pharmacotherapy. 1991;11(5):353-8.
3
Penetration of clindamycin and metronidazole into inflamed appendiceal tissue.
Eur J Surg. 1996 Aug;162(8):633-5.
4
Prospective randomized study of two different doses of clindamycin admixed with gentamicin in the management of perforated appendicitis.两种不同剂量克林霉素与庆大霉素混合用于治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机研究。
Am Surg. 1993 Apr;59(4):248-55.
5
Penetration of clindamycin and metronidazole into the appendix and peritoneal fluid in children.克林霉素和甲硝唑在儿童阑尾及腹腔液中的渗透情况。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1989;37(2):209-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00558235.
6
A prospective randomized study of moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in penetrating abdominal trauma.一项关于头孢氧哌唑与庆大霉素及克林霉素治疗腹部穿透伤的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jul;163(1):1-4.
7
Twice-daily moxalactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.腹部穿透伤患者中,每日两次使用莫西拉坦与庆大霉素和克林霉素的对比研究。
Clin Pharm. 1985 May-Jun;4(3):316-20.
8
Penetration of clindamycin into the human appendix.克林霉素在人体阑尾中的渗透情况。
Arch Surg. 1978 Sep;113(9):1094-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1978.01370210076010.
9
Oral clindamycin 300 mg BID compared with oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1 g BID in the outpatient treatment of acute recurrent pharyngotonsillitis caused by group a beta-hemolytic streptococci: an international, multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, prospective trial in patients between the ages of 12 and 60 years.口服克林霉素300毫克,每日两次,与口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸1克,每日两次,用于门诊治疗由A组β溶血性链球菌引起的急性复发性咽扁桃体炎:一项针对12至60岁患者的国际、多中心、随机、研究者设盲的前瞻性试验。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.006.
10
Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗住院盆腔感染女性的疗效比较。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦研究组
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;83(2):280-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Have We Neglected to Study Target-Site Drug Exposure in Children? A Systematic Review of the Literature.是否忽视了儿童的靶器官药物暴露研究?文献系统评价
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024 Apr;63(4):439-468. doi: 10.1007/s40262-024-01364-5. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
Bactericidal activity of low-dose clindamycin administered at 8- and 12-hour intervals against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Bacteroides fragilis.每8小时和12小时间隔给予低剂量克林霉素对金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎链球菌和脆弱拟杆菌的杀菌活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Mar;41(3):630-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.3.630.
3
Characterization of bactericidal activity of clindamycin against Bacteroides fragilis via kill curve methods.
通过杀菌曲线法表征克林霉素对脆弱拟杆菌的杀菌活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Aug;40(8):1941-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.8.1941.