• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗住院盆腔感染女性的疗效比较。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦研究组

Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.

作者信息

Sweet R L, Roy S, Faro S, O'Brien W F, Sanfilippo J S, Seidlin M

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;83(2):280-6.

PMID:8290195
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of piperacillin and tazobactam with that of clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with infections of the upper genital tract.

METHODS

This was a randomized open-label trial in hospitalized women with infections of the upper genital tract. Patients were recruited at 12 hospitals in the United States and two hospitals in Canada and were randomly assigned to one of two regimens in a 2:1 ratio. One group received piperacillin, 3 g every 6 hours, and tazobactam, 375 mg every 6 hours; the other group received clindamycin, 900 mg every 8 hours, and gentamicin, 2.5-5.0 mg/kg/day in three divided doses. Therapy with the assigned regimen was to be administered for a minimum of 3 days. Cultures for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were obtained from the site of infection before initiation of therapy. Cultures for Chlamydia trachomatis were also obtained from patients with endometritis or pelvic inflammatory disease. Subjects were evaluated for clinical and bacteriologic response at 24-72 hours and 2-4 weeks after completing therapy.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled; 196 were in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 103 were in the clindamycin-gentamicin group. The most common diagnoses were endometritis (146) and pelvic inflammatory disease (115). The most common microorganisms recovered included: Peptostreptococcus sp (99), Prevotella sp (87), black pigmented Bacteroides (29), B fragilis (11), enterococci (64), group B streptococcus (26), Escherichia coli (31), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (49), and C trachomatis (19). A favorable clinical response occurred in 84.7% (166 of 196) of piperacillin-tazobactam patients and 87.3% (90 of 103) of clindamycin-gentamicin patients. Among those evaluable for bacteriologic response, 78% (67 of 86) and 82% (23 of 28), respectively, had a favorable response. Diarrhea occurred significantly more frequently in the piperacillin-tazobactam group (9.7 versus 2.9%; P = .04), but the majority of episodes were mild to moderate. None of the adverse experiences in either treatment group were considered life-threatening and drug-related.

CONCLUSION

The combination of piperacillin and tazobactam is an effective and well-tolerated antibiotic regimen for the treatment of infections of the upper genital tract in women.

摘要

目的

比较哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与克林霉素-庆大霉素联合用药治疗住院上生殖道感染女性的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项针对住院上生殖道感染女性的随机开放标签试验。在美国的12家医院和加拿大的2家医院招募患者,并以2:1的比例随机分配至两种治疗方案之一。一组每6小时接受3g哌拉西林和375mg他唑巴坦;另一组每8小时接受900mg克林霉素和每日2.5 - 5.0mg/kg分三次给药的庆大霉素。指定方案的治疗至少持续3天。在开始治疗前从感染部位获取需氧菌和厌氧菌培养物。还从子宫内膜炎或盆腔炎患者中获取沙眼衣原体培养物。在完成治疗后的24 - 72小时和2 - 4周对受试者进行临床和细菌学反应评估。

结果

共纳入299例患者;196例在哌拉西林-他唑巴坦组,103例在克林霉素-庆大霉素组。最常见的诊断为子宫内膜炎(146例)和盆腔炎(115例)。分离出的最常见微生物包括:消化链球菌属(99例)、普雷沃菌属(87例)、产黑色素类杆菌(29例)、脆弱拟杆菌(11例)、肠球菌(64例)、B族链球菌(26例)、大肠埃希菌(31例)、淋病奈瑟菌(49例)和沙眼衣原体(19例)。哌拉西林-他唑巴坦组84.7%(196例中的166例)和克林霉素-庆大霉素组87.3%(103例中的90例)出现良好的临床反应。在可评估细菌学反应的患者中,分别有78%(86例中的67例)和82%(28例中的23例)有良好反应。腹泻在哌拉西林-他唑巴坦组显著更频繁发生(9.7%对2.9%;P = 0.04),但大多数发作轻微至中度。两个治疗组的不良事件均未被认为危及生命且与药物相关。

结论

哌拉西林和他唑巴坦联合用药是治疗女性上生殖道感染的一种有效且耐受性良好抗生素方案。

相似文献

1
Piperacillin and tazobactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of hospitalized women with pelvic infection. The Piperacillin/tazobactam Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗住院盆腔感染女性的疗效比较。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦研究组
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;83(2):280-6.
2
Results of the North American trial of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Investigators of the Piperacillin/Tazobactam Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.北美哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素和庆大霉素治疗严重腹腔内感染的试验结果。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦腹腔内感染研究组的研究人员。
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994(573):61-6.
3
Piperacillin versus clindamycin plus gentamicin for pelvic infections.哌拉西林与克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗盆腔感染的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Dec;64(6):762-6.
4
Piperacillin/tazobactam in comparison with clindamycin plus gentamicin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1995 Aug;56(2):102-8.
5
A randomized controlled clinical trial on piperacillin/tazobactam versus ticarcillin/clavulanic acid for the treatment of bacterial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与替卡西林/克拉维酸治疗细菌感染的随机对照临床试验
Chin Med J (Engl). 1998 Nov;111(11):1039-43.
6
Ertapenem once a day versus piperacillin-tazobactam every 6 hours for treatment of acute pelvic infections: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.厄他培南每日一次与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦每6小时一次治疗急性盆腔感染的前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲研究。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2003;11(1):27-37. doi: 10.1155/S1064744903000048.
7
Piperacillin/tazobactam compared with cefuroxime/ metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢呋辛/甲硝唑治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Eur J Surg. 1999 Sep;165(9):875-84. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189393.
8
A comparison of piperacillin and clindamycin plus gentamicin in women with pelvic infections.哌拉西林与克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗女性盆腔感染的比较。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Aug;163(2):156-62.
9
Piperacillin and a combination of clindamycin and gentamicin for the treatment of hospital and community acquired acute pelvic infections including pelvic abscess.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Sep;165(3):223-9.
10
A randomized comparison of gentamicin-clindamycin and cefoxitin-doxycycline in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.庆大霉素-克林霉素与头孢西丁-多西环素治疗急性盆腔炎的随机对照研究
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;75(5):867-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Diseases and complications of the puerperium.产褥期疾病与并发症
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Jun 25;118(Forthcoming):436-46. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0168.
2
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 20;8(8):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub3.
3
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub2.
4
Study of the comparative activity of piperacillin/tazobactam with currently available antibiotics against 8206 aerobic isolates.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与现有抗生素对8206株需氧菌分离株的比较活性研究。
Can J Infect Dis. 1997 May;8(3):147-53. doi: 10.1155/1997/632673.
5
Cross-Canada survey of resistance of 2747 aerobic blood culture isolates to piperacillin/tazobactam and other antibiotics.对2747株需氧血培养分离株对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦及其他抗生素耐药性的全加拿大调查。
Can J Infect Dis. 1998 Jan;9(1):33-44. doi: 10.1155/1998/730838.
6
Piperacillin/Tazobactam (ZOSYN).哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(特治星)。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1996;4(5):258-62. doi: 10.1155/S1064744996000506.
7
Ertapenem once a day versus piperacillin-tazobactam every 6 hours for treatment of acute pelvic infections: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.厄他培南每日一次与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦每6小时一次治疗急性盆腔感染的前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲研究。
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2003;11(1):27-37. doi: 10.1155/S1064744903000048.
8
Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦:对其用于中重度细菌感染的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(11):1135-75. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00006.
9
Piperacillin/tazobactam: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦:其在治疗细菌感染中的应用最新综述
Drugs. 1999 May;57(5):805-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957050-00017.
10
Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis.亚胺培南-西司他丁与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦用于医院获得性肺炎或腹膜炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Nov;42(11):2966-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.11.2966.