Greco Brian J, Meehan Cheryl L, Miller Lance J, Shepherdson David J, Morfeld Kari A, Andrews Jeff, Baker Anne M, Carlstead Kathy, Mench Joy A
Department of Animal Science and Center for Animal Welfare, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
AWARE Institute, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0152490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152490. eCollection 2016.
The management of African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants in zoos involves a range of practices including feeding, exercise, training, and environmental enrichment. These practices are necessary to meet the elephants' nutritional, healthcare, and husbandry needs. However, these practices are not standardized, resulting in likely variation among zoos as well as differences in the way they are applied to individual elephants within a zoo. To characterize elephant management in North America, we collected survey data from zoos accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, developed 26 variables, generated population level descriptive statistics, and analyzed them to identify differences attributable to sex and species. Sixty-seven zoos submitted surveys describing the management of 224 elephants and the training experiences of 227 elephants. Asian elephants spent more time managed (defined as interacting directly with staff) than Africans (mean time managed: Asians = 56.9%; Africans = 48.6%; p<0.001), and managed time increased by 20.2% for every year of age for both species. Enrichment, feeding, and exercise programs were evaluated using diversity indices, with mean scores across zoos in the midrange for these measures. There were an average of 7.2 feedings every 24-hour period, with only 1.2 occurring during the nighttime. Feeding schedules were predictable at 47.5% of zoos. We also calculated the relative use of rewarding and aversive techniques employed during training interactions. The population median was seven on a scale from one (representing only aversive stimuli) to nine (representing only rewarding stimuli). The results of our study provide essential information for understanding management variation that could be relevant to welfare. Furthermore, the variables we created have been used in subsequent elephant welfare analyses.
动物园中非洲象(非洲象属)和亚洲象(亚洲象属)的管理涉及一系列实践活动,包括喂食、锻炼、训练和环境丰容。这些实践对于满足大象的营养、医疗保健和饲养需求至关重要。然而,这些实践并不规范,导致不同动物园之间可能存在差异,并且在动物园内应用于个体大象的方式也有所不同。为了描述北美地区大象的管理情况,我们收集了来自经动物园和水族馆协会认证的动物园的调查数据,制定了26个变量,生成了种群水平的描述性统计数据,并对其进行分析以确定因性别和物种导致的差异。67家动物园提交了描述224头大象管理情况和227头大象训练经历的调查。亚洲象接受管理(定义为直接与工作人员互动)的时间比非洲象长(平均管理时间:亚洲象 = 56.9%;非洲象 = 48.6%;p<0.001),并且两个物种的管理时间均随年龄增长每年增加20.2%。使用多样性指数对丰容、喂食和锻炼计划进行评估,这些措施在各动物园的平均得分处于中等范围。每24小时平均有7.2次喂食,其中只有1.2次在夜间进行。47.5%的动物园的喂食时间表是可预测的。我们还计算了训练互动中奖励和厌恶技术的相对使用情况。在从1(仅代表厌恶刺激)到9(仅代表奖励刺激)的量表上,总体中位数为7。我们的研究结果为理解可能与福利相关的管理差异提供了重要信息。此外,我们创建的变量已用于后续的大象福利分析。