Suppr超能文献

动物园大象的躺卧行为:确定躺卧休息的模式、频率及相关环境和社会因素

Recumbence Behavior in Zoo Elephants: Determination of Patterns and Frequency of Recumbent Rest and Associated Environmental and Social Factors.

作者信息

Holdgate Matthew R, Meehan Cheryl L, Hogan Jennifer N, Miller Lance J, Rushen Jeff, de Passillé Anne Marie, Soltis Joseph, Andrews Jeff, Shepherdson David J

机构信息

Department of Biology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.

Conservation Research Division, Oregon Zoo, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0153301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153301. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Resting behaviors are an essential component of animal welfare but have received little attention in zoological research. African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) and Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) rest includes recumbent postures, but no large-scale investigation of African and Asian zoo elephant recumbence has been previously conducted. We used anklets equipped with accelerometers to measure recumbence in 72 adult female African (n = 44) and Asian (n = 28) elephants housed in 40 North American zoos. We collected 344 days of data and determined associations between recumbence and social, housing, management, and demographic factors. African elephants were recumbent less (2.1 hours/day, S.D. = 1.1) than Asian elephants (3.2 hours/day, S.D. = 1.5; P < 0.001). Nearly one-third of elephants were non-recumbent on at least one night, suggesting this is a common behavior. Multi-variable regression models for each species showed that substrate, space, and social variables had the strongest associations with recumbence. In the African model, elephants who spent any amount of time housed on all-hard substrate were recumbent 0.6 hours less per day than those who were never on all-hard substrate, and elephants who experienced an additional acre of outdoor space at night increased their recumbence by 0.48 hours per day. In the Asian model, elephants who spent any amount of time housed on all-soft substrate were recumbent 1.1 hours more per day more than those who were never on all-soft substrate, and elephants who spent any amount of time housed alone were recumbent 0.77 hours more per day than elephants who were never housed alone. Our results draw attention to the significant interspecific difference in the amount of recumbent rest and in the factors affecting recumbence; however, in both species, the influence of flooring substrate is notably important to recumbent rest, and by extension, zoo elephant welfare.

摘要

休息行为是动物福利的重要组成部分,但在动物学研究中却很少受到关注。非洲草原象(Loxodonta africana)和亚洲象(Elephas maximus)的休息包括躺卧姿势,但此前尚未对非洲和亚洲动物园大象的躺卧情况进行大规模调查。我们使用配备加速度计的脚环来测量40家北美动物园中72头成年雌性非洲象(n = 44)和亚洲象(n = 28)的躺卧情况。我们收集了344天的数据,并确定了躺卧与社会、饲养、管理和人口统计学因素之间的关联。非洲象的躺卧时间(每天2.1小时,标准差 = 1.1)比亚洲象(每天3.2小时,标准差 = 1.5;P < 0.001)少。近三分之一的大象至少有一个晚上没有躺卧,这表明这是一种常见行为。针对每个物种的多变量回归模型表明,垫料、空间和社会变量与躺卧的关联最强。在非洲象模型中,在全硬垫料上饲养过的大象每天的躺卧时间比从未在全硬垫料上饲养过的大象少0.6小时,而夜间额外拥有一英亩户外空间的大象每天的躺卧时间增加0.48小时。在亚洲象模型中,在全软垫料上饲养过的大象每天的躺卧时间比从未在全软垫料上饲养过的大象多1.1小时,而单独饲养过的大象每天的躺卧时间比从未单独饲养过的大象多0.77小时。我们的研究结果提请人们注意躺卧休息时间和影响躺卧的因素存在显著的种间差异;然而,在这两个物种中,垫料对躺卧休息的影响都非常重要,进而对动物园大象的福利也很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6cc/4945027/8adb121200b2/pone.0153301.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验