Suppr超能文献

经多普勒超声心动图测量左心室后壁的低速运动。

Doppler echocardiographic measurement of low velocity motion of the left ventricular posterior wall.

作者信息

Isaaz K, Thompson A, Ethevenot G, Cloez J L, Brembilla B, Pernot C

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Nancy, France.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1989 Jul 1;64(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90655-3.

Abstract

A new noninvasive method using pulsed Doppler echocardiography was developed to assess left ventricular (LV) posterior wall motion dynamics. Seventeen normal subjects and 23 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were prospectively studied. The sample volume was placed within the LV posterior wall endocardium just apical to the mitral valve sulcus using a posteriorly angulated low parasternal view. The wall filter was set at 100 Hz to record the low velocities of the LV posterior wall motion. The Doppler signal was morphologically similar to the rate of change of the LV posterior wall endocardium excursion obtained by a digitized M-mode echocardiogram, and showed 3 major waves: a systolic wave (S), an early diastolic wave (E) and a late diastolic wave (A). The peak velocities of LV posterior wall endocardium excursion were also determined by M-mode echocardiographic technique. We found a significant linear correlation between peak E-wave velocity and M-mode peak diastolic endocardial velocity (r = 0.90, p less than 0.001) and between peak S-wave velocity and M-mode peak systolic endocardial velocity (r = 0.81, p less than 0.001). M-mode peak systolic endocardial velocity showed an important overlap between control subjects and patients with normal and patients with abnormal LV posterior wall motion on the angiogram. In contrast, peak S-wave velocity was a better discriminator, and a peak S-wave velocity less than 7.5 cm/s was associated with abnormal LV posterior wall motion with an 83% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 95% accuracy. In patients with coronary artery disease but normal systolic LV posterior wall motion and normal global systolic LV function, peak S-wave velocity was not different when compared to control subjects. Peak E-wave velocity and E/A were significantly lower than in control subjects (p less than 0.01) and peak A-wave velocity was greater (p less than 0.01). In conclusion, these data suggest that pulsed Doppler echocardiography can be used for the direct analysis of LV posterior wall instantaneous low velocities and appears to be more informative than M-mode technique for systolic measurements. Thus, detection of abnormal LV posterior wall diastolic motion by pulsed Doppler echocardiography may, upon additional confirmation, be used as a new noninvasive method to gain insight into global LV diastolic performance.

摘要

一种使用脉冲多普勒超声心动图的新型非侵入性方法被开发出来,用于评估左心室(LV)后壁运动动力学。对17名正常受试者和23名接受心导管检查的患者进行了前瞻性研究。使用向后成角的低位胸骨旁视图,将取样容积置于二尖瓣沟尖部的左心室后壁心内膜内。壁滤波器设置为100Hz,以记录左心室后壁运动的低速。多普勒信号在形态上与通过数字化M型超声心动图获得的左心室后壁心内膜偏移变化率相似,并显示出3个主要波:一个收缩期波(S)、一个舒张早期波(E)和一个舒张晚期波(A)。左心室后壁心内膜偏移的峰值速度也通过M型超声心动图技术测定。我们发现E波峰值速度与M型舒张期末心内膜峰值速度之间存在显著的线性相关性(r = 0.90,p < 0.001),以及S波峰值速度与M型收缩期心内膜峰值速度之间存在显著的线性相关性(r = 0.81,p < 0.001)。M型收缩期心内膜峰值速度在对照组受试者与血管造影显示左心室后壁运动正常和异常的患者之间存在重要重叠。相比之下,S波峰值速度是更好的鉴别指标,S波峰值速度小于7.5cm/s与左心室后壁运动异常相关,敏感性为83%,特异性为100%,准确性为95%。在患有冠状动脉疾病但左心室后壁收缩运动正常且左心室整体收缩功能正常的患者中,与对照组受试者相比,S波峰值速度没有差异。E波峰值速度和E/A显著低于对照组受试者(p < 0.01),A波峰值速度更高(p < 0.01)。总之,这些数据表明,脉冲多普勒超声心动图可用于直接分析左心室后壁瞬时低速,并且在收缩期测量方面似乎比M型技术提供更多信息。因此,经脉冲多普勒超声心动图检测到的左心室后壁舒张运动异常,经进一步证实后,可能用作一种新的非侵入性方法来深入了解左心室整体舒张功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验