Finnoff Jonathan T, Johnson Adam C, Hollman John H
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center, 600 Hennepin Ave, #310, Minneapolis, MN 55403(∗).
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN(†).
PM R. 2017 Apr;9(4):392-397. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.06.024. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
Ischiofemoral impingement is a potential cause of hip and buttock pain. It is evaluated commonly with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To our knowledge, no study previously has evaluated the ability of ultrasound to measure the ischiofemoral space (IFS) dimensions reliably.
To determine whether ultrasound could accurately measure the IFS dimensions when compared with the gold standard imaging modality of MRI.
A methods comparison study.
Sports medicine center within a tertiary-care institution.
A total of 5 male and 5 female asymptomatic adult subjects (age mean = 29.2 years, range = 23-35 years; body mass index mean = 23.5, range = 19.5-26.6) were recruited to participate in the study.
Subjects were secured in a prone position on a MRI table with their hips in a neutral position. Their IFS dimensions were then acquired in a randomized order using diagnostic ultrasound and MRI.
The main outcome measurements were the IFS dimensions acquired with ultrasound and MRI.
The mean IFS dimensions measured with ultrasound was 29.5 mm (standard deviation [SD] 4.99 mm, standard error mean 1.12 mm), whereas those obtained with MRI were 28.25 mm (SD 5.91 mm, standard error mean 1.32 mm). The mean difference between the ultrasound and MRI measurements was 1.25 mm, which was not statistically significant (SD 3.71 mm, standard error mean 3.71 mm, 95% confidence interval -0.49 mm to 2.98 mm, t = 1.506, P = .15). The Bland-Altman analysis indicated that the 95% limits of agreement between the 2 measurement was -6.0 to 8.5 mm, indicating that there was no systematic bias between the ultrasound and MRI measurements.
Our findings suggest that the IFS measurements obtained with ultrasound are very similar to those obtained with MRI. Therefore, when evaluating individuals with suspected ischiofemoral impingement, one could consider using ultrasound to measure their IFS dimensions.
III.
坐骨股骨撞击是髋部和臀部疼痛的一个潜在原因。其通常通过磁共振成像(MRI)进行评估。据我们所知,此前尚无研究评估超声可靠测量坐骨股骨间隙(IFS)尺寸的能力。
确定与MRI这一金标准成像方式相比,超声能否准确测量IFS尺寸。
一项方法比较研究。
一家三级医疗机构内的运动医学中心。
共招募了5名男性和5名女性无症状成年受试者(平均年龄 = 29.2岁,范围 = 23 - 35岁;平均体重指数 = 23.5,范围 = 19.5 - 26.6)参与本研究。
受试者俯卧于MRI检查台上,髋部处于中立位。然后以随机顺序使用诊断超声和MRI获取其IFS尺寸。
主要结局指标为通过超声和MRI获取的IFS尺寸。
超声测量的IFS平均尺寸为29.5毫米(标准差[SD]4.99毫米,标准误均值1.12毫米),而MRI测量的为28.25毫米(SD 5.91毫米,标准误均值1.32毫米)。超声和MRI测量结果之间的平均差异为1.25毫米,无统计学意义(SD 3.71毫米,标准误均值3.71毫米,95%置信区间 -0.49毫米至2.98毫米,t = 1.506,P = 0.15)。Bland - Altman分析表明,两种测量方法之间的95%一致性界限为 -6.0至8.5毫米,表明超声和MRI测量之间不存在系统偏差。
我们的研究结果表明,超声获取的IFS测量值与MRI获取的非常相似。因此,在评估疑似坐骨股骨撞击的个体时,可以考虑使用超声测量其IFS尺寸。
III级。