Suppr超能文献

超声诊断坐骨股骨空间准确性评估 - 一项验证研究。

The accuracy assessment of ultrasound for the diagnosis of ischiofemoral space - A Validation Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.

Department of Ultrasonography, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.

出版信息

J Xray Sci Technol. 2019;27(4):605-614. doi: 10.3233/XST-180482.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (US) imaging for measurement of ischiofemoral space (IFS) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Twenty-five hips of 16 patients with hip pain and ipsilateral quadratus femoris muscle (QFM) edema were recruited to the IFI group, and 19 hips of 19 patients without hip pain and QFM edema were recruited as the control group. IFS of both groups was measured by US and MRI. The correlations and differences between US and MRI measurements were then assessed. Last, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The US results revealed a decreased IFS in IFI hips compared with controls (P < 0.001), suggesting that US were valuable in identifying IFI. IFS measured by US and MRI showed positive correlations in both the IFI group (r = 0.409, P = 0.042) and control group (r = 0.575, P = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between IFS measured by US and MRI in the control group (P = 0.657), while IFS measurements in the IFI group performed with US were significantly greater than those with MRI (P < 0.001). ROC curve analysis revealed that the cutoff value of IFS measured with US was 2.14 cm, with a sensitivity of 92.0% and specificity of 68.4%, while measured by MRI was 1.87 cm, with a sensitivity of 96.0% and specificity of 84.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

IFS measurements obtained with US are very similar to those obtained with MRI. Therefore, US provides a low-cost and easy-to-operate alternative imaging modality to measure IFS.

摘要

目的

研究并评估超声(US)成像测量坐骨股骨间隙(IFS)与磁共振成像(MRI)的准确性。

方法

招募了 16 名患有髋痛和同侧股方肌(QFM)肿胀的患者的 25 个髋关节(IFI 组),以及 19 名无髋痛和 QFM 肿胀的患者的 19 个髋关节作为对照组。使用 US 和 MRI 测量两组的 IFS。然后评估 US 和 MRI 测量之间的相关性和差异。最后,进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)数据分析。

结果

US 结果显示,IFI 髋部的 IFS 明显小于对照组(P<0.001),提示 US 对识别 IFI 有价值。US 和 MRI 测量的 IFS 在 IFI 组(r=0.409,P=0.042)和对照组(r=0.575,P=0.01)中均呈正相关。在对照组中,US 和 MRI 测量的 IFS 之间没有统计学差异(P=0.657),而在 IFI 组中,US 测量的 IFS 明显大于 MRI 测量的 IFS(P<0.001)。ROC 曲线分析显示,US 测量的 IFS 的截断值为 2.14cm,敏感性为 92.0%,特异性为 68.4%,而 MRI 测量的截断值为 1.87cm,敏感性为 96.0%,特异性为 84.2%。

结论

US 测量的 IFS 与 MRI 非常相似。因此,US 提供了一种低成本、易于操作的替代成像方式来测量 IFS。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验