Paz-Soldan Valerie A, Bauer Karin M, Lenhart Audrey, Cordova Lopez Jhonny J, Elder John P, Scott Thomas W, McCall Philip J, Kochel Tadeusz J, Morrison Amy C
Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Facultad de Salud Pública y Administración, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 16;16:582. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3191-x.
Dengue is an arthropod-borne viral disease responsible for approximately 400 million infections annually; the only available method of prevention is vector control. It has been previously demonstrated that insecticide treated curtains (ITCs) can lower dengue vector infestations in and around houses. As part of a larger trial examining whether ITCs could reduce dengue transmission in Iquitos, Peru, the objective of this study was to characterize the participants' experience with the ITCs using qualitative methods.
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) surveys (at baseline, and 9 and 27 months post-ITC distribution, with n = 593, 595 and 511, respectively), focus group discussions (at 6 and 12 months post-ITC distribution, with n = 18 and 33, respectively), and 11 one-on-one interviews (at 12 months post-distribution) were conducted with 605 participants who received ITCs as part of a cluster-randomized trial.
Focus groups at 6 months post-ITC distribution revealed that individuals had observed their ITCs to function for approximately 3 months, after which they reported the ITCs were no longer working. Follow up revealed that the ITCs required re-treatment with insecticide at approximately 1 year post-distribution. Over half (55.3 %, n = 329) of participants at 9 months post-ITC distribution and over a third (34.8 %, n = 177) at 27 months post-ITC distribution reported perceiving a decrease in the number of mosquitoes in their home. The percentage of participants who would recommend ITCs to their family or friends in the future remained high throughout the study (94.3 %, n = 561 at 9 months and 94.6 %, n = 488 at 27 months post-distribution). When asked why, participants reported that ITCs were effective at reducing mosquitoes (81.6 and 37.8 %, at 9 and 27 months respectively), that they prevent dengue (5.7 and 51.2 %, at 9 and 27 months), that they are "beautiful" (5.9 and 3.1 %), as well as other reasons (6.9 and 2.5 %).
ITCs have substantial potential for long term dengue vector control because they are liked by users, both for their perceived effectiveness and for aesthetic reasons, and because they require little proactive behavioral effort on the part of the users. Our results highlight the importance of gathering process (as opposed to outcome) data during vector control studies, without which researchers would not have become aware that the ITCs had lost effectiveness early in the trial.
登革热是一种节肢动物传播的病毒性疾病,每年造成约4亿人感染;唯一可用的预防方法是病媒控制。此前已有研究表明,经杀虫剂处理的窗帘(ITC)可降低房屋内外的登革热媒介滋生。作为一项更大规模试验的一部分,该试验旨在研究ITC是否能减少秘鲁伊基托斯的登革热传播,本研究的目的是采用定性方法描述参与者使用ITC的体验。
对605名作为整群随机试验一部分接受ITC的参与者进行了知识、态度和行为(KAP)调查(分别在基线、ITC分发后9个月和27个月进行,n分别为593、595和511)、焦点小组讨论(在ITC分发后6个月和12个月进行,n分别为18和33)以及11次一对一访谈(在分发后12个月进行)。
ITC分发后6个月的焦点小组讨论显示,参与者观察到他们的ITC能发挥作用约3个月,之后他们报告ITC不再起作用。后续调查显示,ITC在分发后约1年需要重新用杀虫剂处理。ITC分发后9个月,超过一半(55.3%,n = 329)的参与者以及ITC分发后27个月超过三分之一(34.8%,n = 177)的参与者报告感觉家中蚊子数量减少。在整个研究过程中,未来会向家人或朋友推荐ITC的参与者比例一直很高(分发后9个月为94.3%,n = 561;分发后27个月为94.6%,n = 488)。当被问及原因时,参与者报告说ITC能有效减少蚊子(分别在9个月和27个月时为81.6%和37.8%)、预防登革热(分别在9个月和27个月时为5.7%和51.2%)、“美观”(分别在9个月和27个月时为5.9%和3.1%)以及其他原因(分别在9个月和27个月时为6.9%和2.5%)。
ITC在长期登革热媒介控制方面具有巨大潜力,因为用户喜欢使用它,既因其被认为的有效性,也因其美观,而且用户几乎无需主动付出行为努力。我们的结果凸显了在病媒控制研究中收集过程(而非结果)数据的重要性,否则研究人员不会意识到ITC在试验早期就已失去有效性。