Wilson Anne L, Dhiman Ramesh C, Kitron Uriel, Scott Thomas W, van den Berg Henk, Lindsay Steven W
School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Stockton Road, Durham, United Kingdom.
National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Oct 9;8(10):e3228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003228. eCollection 2014 Oct.
Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are one of the main interventions used for malaria control. However, these nets may also be effective against other vector borne diseases (VBDs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy of ITNs, insecticide-treated curtains (ITCs) and insecticide-treated house screening (ITS) against Chagas disease, cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis, dengue, human African trypanosomiasis, Japanese encephalitis, lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and Tropical Disease Bulletin databases were searched using intervention, vector- and disease-specific search terms. Cluster or individually randomised controlled trials, non-randomised trials with pre- and post-intervention data and rotational design studies were included. Analysis assessed the efficacy of ITNs, ITCs or ITS versus no intervention. Meta-analysis of clinical data was performed and percentage reduction in vector density calculated.
Twenty-one studies were identified which met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of clinical data could only be performed for four cutaneous leishmaniasis studies which together showed a protective efficacy of ITNs of 77% (95%CI: 39%-91%). Studies of ITC and ITS against cutaneous leishmaniasis also reported significant reductions in disease incidence. Single studies reported a high protective efficacy of ITS against dengue and ITNs against Japanese encephalitis. No studies of Chagas disease, human African trypanosomiasis or onchocerciasis were identified.
There are likely to be considerable collateral benefits of ITN roll out on cutaneous leishmaniasis where this disease is co-endemic with malaria. Due to the low number of studies identified, issues with reporting of entomological outcomes, and few studies reporting clinical outcomes, it is difficult to make strong conclusions on the effect of ITNs, ITCs or ITS on other VBDs and therefore further studies be conducted. Nonetheless, it is clear that insecticide-treated materials such as ITNs have the potential to reduce pathogen transmission and morbidity from VBDs where vectors enter houses.
经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)是用于疟疾控制的主要干预措施之一。然而,这些蚊帐可能对其他病媒传播疾病(VBD)也有效。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐、经杀虫剂处理的窗帘(ITC)和经杀虫剂处理的房屋纱窗(ITS)对恰加斯病、皮肤利什曼病和内脏利什曼病、登革热、非洲人类锥虫病、日本脑炎、淋巴丝虫病和盘尾丝虫病的疗效。
使用干预、病媒和疾病特异性检索词对MEDLINE、EMBASE、LILACS和《热带病通报》数据库进行检索。纳入整群或个体随机对照试验、有干预前后数据的非随机试验以及轮作设计研究。分析评估了经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐、经杀虫剂处理的窗帘或经杀虫剂处理的房屋纱窗与无干预措施相比的疗效。对临床数据进行荟萃分析,并计算病媒密度降低的百分比。
确定了21项符合纳入标准的研究。仅对4项皮肤利什曼病研究进行了临床数据的荟萃分析,这些研究共同显示经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐的保护效力为77%(95%CI:39%-91%)。关于经杀虫剂处理的窗帘和经杀虫剂处理的房屋纱窗对皮肤利什曼病的研究也报告了疾病发病率的显著降低。单项研究报告经杀虫剂处理的房屋纱窗对登革热和经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐对日本脑炎具有较高的保护效力。未发现有关恰加斯病、非洲人类锥虫病或盘尾丝虫病的研究。
在皮肤利什曼病与疟疾共同流行的地区,推广经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐可能会带来相当大的附带益处。由于所确定的研究数量较少、昆虫学结果报告存在问题以及报告临床结果的研究较少,因此很难就经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐、经杀虫剂处理的窗帘或经杀虫剂处理的房屋纱窗对其他病媒传播疾病的影响得出有力结论,因此需要进一步开展研究。尽管如此,很明显,诸如经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐等材料有潜力减少病媒进入房屋的病媒传播疾病的病原体传播和发病率。