Godel Tim, Pham Mirko, Heiland Sabine, Bendszus Martin, Bäumer Philipp
Department of Neuroradiology, Neurological University Clinic, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Neuroradiology, Neurological University Clinic, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Institute, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 1;141:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
To develop an in-vivo imaging method for the measurement of dorsal-root-ganglia-(DRG) perfusion, to establish its normal values in patients without known peripheral nerve disorders or radicular pain syndromes and to determine the physiological spatial perfusion pattern within the DRG.
This prospective study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. 46 (24 female, 22 male, mean age 46.0±15.2years) subjects without known peripheral neuropathies or pain syndromes were examined by a 3Tesla MRI scanner (Magnetom VERIO or TRIO, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) with a VIBE (Volume-Interpolated-Breathhold-Examination) dynamic-contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1-w-sequence (TR/TE 3.3/1.11ms; 24 slices; voxel resolution 1.3×1.3×3.0mm(3)) covered the pelvis from the upper plate of the 5th lumbar vertebra to the 2nd sacral vertebra. Transfer-constant (K(trans)) and interstitial-volume-fraction (interstitial-leakage-fraction, Ve) were modeled for the DRG and spinal nerve by applying the Tofts-model. Statistical analyses included pairwise comparisons of L5/S1 DRG vs. spinal nerve. Furthermore, distinct physiological zones within the S1 DRG were compared (cell body rich area (CBRA) vs. nerve fiber rich area (NFRA)).
DRG showed a significantly increased permeability compared to spinal nerve (K(trans) 3.8±1.5 10(-3)/min vs. 1.6±0.9 10(-3)/min, p-value: <0.001) combined with an increased interstitial leakage of contrast agent into the extravascular-extracellular-space (Ve 38.1±19.2% vs. 17.3±9.9%, p-value: <0.001). Parameters showed no statistically significant difference on DRG-level (L5 vs. S1; p-value: 0.62 (K(trans)); 0.17 (Ve)) and -side (left vs. right; p-value: 0.25 (K(trans)); 0.79 (Ve)). Female gender was associated with a significantly increased permeability (K(trans) female 4.3±1.4 10(-3)/min vs. male 3.4±0.9 10(-3)/min, p-value: <0.05) but no statistically significant differences in interstitial leakage (Ve female 40.1±14,1% vs. male 34.5±17.4%, p-value: 0.24). DRG showed distinct spatial distribution patterns of perfusion: K(trans) and Ve were significantly higher in the CBRA than in the NFRA (K(trans) 4.4±1.8 10(-3)/min vs. 1.7±1.2 10(-3)/min, p-value: <0.001 and Ve 40.9±21.3% vs. 15.1±11.7%, p-value: <0.001).
Non-invasive and in-vivo measurement of human DRG perfusion by MRI is a feasible technique. DRG show substantially higher permeability and interstitial leakage than spinal nerves. Even distinct physiological perfusion patterns for different microstructural compartments could be observed within the DRG. The technique may become particularly useful for future research on the poorly understood human sensory neuropathies and pain syndromes.
开发一种用于测量背根神经节(DRG)灌注的体内成像方法,确定无已知周围神经疾病或神经根疼痛综合征患者的正常数值,并确定DRG内的生理空间灌注模式。
本前瞻性研究经机构伦理委员会批准,所有参与者均签署了书面知情同意书。46名(24名女性,22名男性,平均年龄46.0±15.2岁)无已知周围神经病变或疼痛综合征的受试者接受了3特斯拉磁共振成像扫描仪(Magnetom VERIO或TRIO,西门子公司,德国埃尔朗根)检查,采用容积内插屏气检查(VIBE)动态对比增强(DCE)T1加权序列(TR/TE 3.3/1.11毫秒;24层;体素分辨率1.3×1.3×3.0毫米³),覆盖从第5腰椎上缘至第2骶椎的骨盆。通过应用Tofts模型对DRG和脊神经的转移常数(K(trans))和组织间隙容积分数(组织间隙渗漏分数,Ve)进行建模。统计分析包括L5/S1 DRG与脊神经的成对比较。此外,还比较了S1 DRG内不同的生理区域(细胞体丰富区(CBRA)与神经纤维丰富区(NFRA))。
与脊神经相比,DRG的通透性显著增加(K(trans) 3.8±1.5×10⁻³/分钟 vs. 1.6±0.9×10⁻³/分钟,p值:<0.001),同时造影剂向血管外细胞外间隙的组织间隙渗漏增加(Ve 38.1±19.2% vs. 17.3±9.9%,p值:<0.001)。参数在DRG水平(L5与S1;p值:0.62(K(trans));0.17(Ve))和侧别(左侧与右侧;p值:0.25(K(trans));0.79(Ve))上无统计学显著差异。女性的通透性显著增加(女性K(trans) 4.3±1.4×10⁻³/分钟 vs. 男性3.4±0.9×10⁻³/分钟;p值:<0.05),但组织间隙渗漏无统计学显著差异(女性Ve 40.1±14.1% vs. 男性34.5±17.4%,p值:0.24)。DRG显示出不同的灌注空间分布模式:CBRA中的K(trans)和Ve显著高于NFRA(K(trans) 4.4±1.8×10⁻³/分钟 vs. 1.7±1.2×10⁻³/分钟,p值:<0.001;Ve 40.9±21.3% vs. 15.1±11.7%,p值:<0.001)。
通过MRI对人体DRG灌注进行无创体内测量是一种可行的技术。DRG的通透性和组织间隙渗漏比脊神经高得多。在DRG内甚至可以观察到不同微观结构区域的不同生理灌注模式。该技术可能对未来关于了解甚少的人类感觉神经病变和疼痛综合征的研究特别有用。