Capalbo Antonio, Romanelli Valeria, Cimadomo Danilo, Girardi Laura, Stoppa Marta, Dovere Lisa, Dell'Edera Domenico, Ubaldi Filippo Maria, Rienzi Laura
GENERA Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Marostica, Italy.
GENETYX, Molecular Biology Laboratory, Marostica, Italy.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Oct;33(10):1279-1286. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0768-3. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
For an IVF clinic that wishes to implement preimplantation genetic diagnosis for monogenic diseases (PGD) and for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A), a global improvement is required through all the steps of an IVF treatment and patient care. At present, CCS (Comprehensive Chromosome Screening)-based trophectoderm (TE) biopsy has been demonstrated as a safe, accurate and reproducible approach to conduct PGD-A and possibly also PGD from the same biopsy. Key challenges in PGD/PGD-A implementation cover genetic and reproductive counselling, selection of the most efficient approach for blastocyst biopsy as well as of the best performing molecular technique to conduct CCS and monogenic disease analysis. Three different approaches for TE biopsy can be compared. However, among them, the application of TE biopsy approaches, entailing the zona opening when the expanded blastocyst stage is reached, represent the only biopsy methods suited with a totally undisturbed embryo culture strategy (time lapse-based incubation in a single media). Moreover, contemporary CCS technologies show a different spectrum of capabilities and limits that potentially impact the clinical outcomes, the management and the applicability of the PGD-A itself. In general, CCS approaches that avoid the use of whole genome amplification (WGA) can provide higher reliability of results with lower costs and turnaround time of analysis. The future perspectives are focused on the scrupulous and rigorous clinical validations of novel CCS methods based on targeted approaches that avoid the use of WGA, such as targeted next-generation sequencing technology, to further improve the throughput of analysis and the overall cost-effectiveness of PGD/PGD-A.
对于希望开展单基因疾病植入前基因诊断(PGD)和非整倍体检测(PGD-A)的体外受精(IVF)诊所而言,需要在IVF治疗和患者护理的所有环节实现全面改进。目前,基于全面染色体筛查(CCS)的滋养外胚层(TE)活检已被证明是一种安全、准确且可重复的方法,可用于进行PGD-A,或许还能从同一次活检中进行PGD。PGD/PGD-A实施过程中的关键挑战包括遗传和生殖咨询、选择最有效的囊胚活检方法以及选择用于进行CCS和单基因疾病分析的最佳分子技术。可以比较三种不同的TE活检方法。然而,在这些方法中,TE活检方法的应用,即在囊胚扩张期打开透明带,是唯一适合完全不受干扰的胚胎培养策略(在单一培养基中基于延时成像的培养)的活检方法。此外,当代CCS技术展现出不同的能力和局限性,这可能会影响临床结果、PGD-A本身的管理及适用性。一般来说,避免使用全基因组扩增(WGA)的CCS方法能够以更低的成本和分析周转时间提供更高的结果可靠性。未来的发展方向聚焦于对基于靶向方法且避免使用WGA的新型CCS方法进行严谨的临床验证,如靶向新一代测序技术,以进一步提高分析通量以及PGD/PGD-A的整体成本效益。