Association Française contre les Myopathies, AFM-Téléthon, Evry, France.
Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Feb 10;16(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01670-8.
The development of new genetic testing methods and the approval of the first treatments raises questions regarding when and how to perform screening for inherited neuromuscular conditions. Screening directives and access to the different techniques is not uniform across Europe. The patient advisory board of the European reference network for rare neuromuscular diseases (NMD) conducted a qualitative study to understand the state of play of screening for inherited NMD in Europe and patients' needs.
We collected answers from 30 patient organisations (POs) from 18 European countries. Fifteen acknowledge the existence of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in their country. Regarding prenatal screening, we had 25 positive answers and 5 negative ones. Twenty-four POs mentioned that newborn screening was available in their country. We had some contradictory answers from POs from the same country and in some cases; diseases said to be part of the screening programmes were not hereditary disorders. Twenty-eight organisations were in favour of screening tests. The reasons for the two negative answers were lack of reimbursement and treatment, religious beliefs and eventual insurance constrains. Most POs (21) were in favour of systematic screening with the option to opt-out. Regarding the timing for screening, "at birth", was the most consensual response. The main priority to perform screening for NMDs was early access to treatment, followed by shorter time to diagnostic, preventive care and genetic counselling.
This is the first study to assess knowledge and needs of POs concerning screening for NMDs. The knowledge of POs regarding screening techniques is quite uneven. This implies that, even in communities highly motivated and knowledgeable of the conditions they advocate for, there is a need for better information. Differences in the responses to the questions "how and when to screen" shows that the screening path depends on the disease and the presence of a disease modifying treatment. The unmet need for screening inherited NMDs should follow an adaptive pathway related to the fast moving medical landscape of NMDs. International coordination leading to a common policy would certainly be a precious asset tending to harmonize the situation amongst European countries.
新的基因检测方法的发展和首批治疗方法的获批引发了关于何时以及如何进行遗传性神经肌肉疾病筛查的问题。欧洲各地的筛查指南和获取不同技术的途径并不统一。欧洲罕见神经肌肉疾病参考网络的患者顾问委员会进行了一项定性研究,以了解欧洲遗传性神经肌肉疾病筛查的现状和患者的需求。
我们从 18 个欧洲国家的 30 个患者组织(PO)收集了答案。15 个国家承认其国内存在胚胎植入前基因诊断。关于产前筛查,我们得到了 25 个肯定回答和 5 个否定回答。24 个 PO 表示其国内有新生儿筛查。我们从来自同一国家的 PO 那里得到了一些相互矛盾的答案,在某些情况下,被认为是筛查计划一部分的疾病并非遗传性疾病。28 个组织赞成进行筛查测试。两个否定答案的原因是缺乏报销和治疗、宗教信仰以及潜在的保险限制。大多数 PO(21)赞成系统筛查并选择退出。关于筛查时间,“出生时”是最一致的回答。进行神经肌肉疾病筛查的主要优先事项是早期获得治疗,其次是诊断、预防保健和遗传咨询的时间更短。
这是第一项评估 PO 对神经肌肉疾病筛查的知识和需求的研究。PO 对筛查技术的了解非常参差不齐。这意味着,即使在高度关注和了解其倡导的疾病的社区中,也需要更好的信息。对“如何以及何时进行筛查”的问题的不同回答表明,筛查路径取决于疾病和是否存在疾病修饰治疗。筛查遗传性神经肌肉疾病的未满足需求应遵循与神经肌肉疾病快速发展的医疗领域相关的适应性途径。国际协调将导致共同政策,这无疑将有助于协调欧洲各国之间的情况。