• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结论:面对复杂性的能动性与假设感知评估实践的未来。

Conclusion: Agency in the face of complexity and the future of assumption-aware evaluation practice.

作者信息

Morrow Nathan, Nkwake Apollo M

机构信息

Payson Program for Global Development, Tulane University, 5208 Magazine St, #188, New Orleans, LA 70115, United States.

African Women in Agricultural Research and Development (AWARD), Hosted by World Agroforestry Centre, United Nations Avenue, Gigiri, P.O. Box 30677-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.013
PMID:27423925
Abstract

This final chapter in the volume pulls together common themes from the diverse set of articles by a group of eight authors in this issue, and presents some reflections on the next steps for improving the ways in which evaluators work with assumptions. Collectively, the authors provide a broad overview of existing and emerging approaches to the articulation and use of assumptions in evaluation theory and practice. The authors reiterate the rationale and key terminology as a common basis for working with assumption in program design and evaluation. They highlight some useful concepts and categorizations to promote more rigorous treatment of assumptions in evaluation. A three-tier framework for fostering agency for assumption-aware evaluation practice is proposed-agency for themselves (evaluators); agency for others (stakeholders); and agency for standards and principles.

摘要

本卷的最后一章汇总了本期八位作者撰写的一系列不同文章中的共同主题,并对评估人员在处理假设时改进工作方式的后续步骤提出了一些思考。总体而言,作者们对评估理论与实践中阐述和运用假设的现有及新兴方法进行了广泛概述。作者们重申了基本原理和关键术语,作为在项目设计和评估中处理假设的共同基础。他们强调了一些有用的概念和分类,以促进在评估中对假设进行更严谨的处理。文中提出了一个三层框架,以促进具有假设意识的评估实践中的能动性——为自身(评估人员)的能动性;为他人(利益相关者)的能动性;以及为标准和原则的能动性。

相似文献

1
Conclusion: Agency in the face of complexity and the future of assumption-aware evaluation practice.结论:面对复杂性的能动性与假设感知评估实践的未来。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
2
Volume overview: Working with assumptions. Existing and emerging approaches for improved program design, monitoring and evaluation.卷首概述:基于假设开展工作。改进项目设计、监测与评估的现有及新出现的方法。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:94-96. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Assumption-aware tools and agency; an interrogation of the primary artifacts of the program evaluation and design profession in working with complex evaluands and complex contexts.具备假设意识的工具与机构;对项目评估与设计专业在处理复杂评估对象和复杂情境时的主要工件进行审视。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:141-153. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
4
Assumptions at the philosophical and programmatic levels in evaluation.
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
5
Clarifying concepts and categories of assumptions for use in evaluation.明确用于评估的假设的概念和类别。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
When does a conceptual framework become a theory? Reflections from an accidental theorist.概念框架何时会成为一种理论?一位非专业理论家的思考。
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Jun;38:67-70. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.016. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
7
Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis.将项目理论与评估理论相结合以推进评估实践:还原论、系统思维与务实综合。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
8
Logic and evaluation theory.逻辑与评估理论。
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Jun;38:71-3. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
9
Logic models: a useful way to study theories of evaluation practice?逻辑模型:研究评估实践理论的一种有用方法?
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Jun;38:77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.019. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
Applying complexity theory: a review to inform evaluation design.应用复杂性理论:一项为评估设计提供信息的综述
Eval Program Plann. 2014 Aug;45:119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 13.