McGee Richard
Associate Dean for Professional Development, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 420 E. Superior Ave, Rubloff 6-647, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2016 Sep;20 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):231-7. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1486-7.
Like all biomedical research fields, AIDS research needs the broadest diversity of experiences and perspectives among researchers in the field if creative advancements are to be achieved. Mentors and mentoring are the most important vehicles by which the talents of young scientists are developed. However, mentoring as a teaching and learning paradigm is very complex and idiosyncratic, and often inadvertently fails to provide the same quality and quantity of opportunity to aspiring scientists who are 'different' from those doing the mentoring. This article provides a theoretical and practical framework for understanding how differences of race, ethnicity, gender, skin color, social status and other identifiable characteristics can play into scientific development during mentoring 'within the pipeline'. It also serves as a foundation upon which mentoring in AIDS is considered by subsequent papers in this series. Finally, it goes beyond mentoring to propose systematic coaching as an effective complement to research mentoring to promote success, especially for individuals from underrepresented groups.
与所有生物医学研究领域一样,如果要实现创新性进展,艾滋病研究需要该领域研究人员具备最广泛多样的经验和观点。导师和指导是培养年轻科学家才能的最重要途径。然而,作为一种教学和学习模式,指导非常复杂且因人而异,往往会无意中未能为那些与进行指导的人“不同”的有抱负的科学家提供同等质量和数量的机会。本文提供了一个理论和实践框架,以理解种族、民族、性别、肤色、社会地位和其他可识别特征的差异如何在“培养过程”中的指导期间影响科学发展。它也为该系列后续论文考虑艾滋病领域的指导奠定了基础。最后,它超越了指导,提出系统辅导作为研究指导的有效补充,以促进成功,特别是对于代表性不足群体的个人。