Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Aug;9(8):964-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of increased aortic angulation (AA) on acute procedural success following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
The degree of angulation between the aorta and the heart can make accurate positioning of the bioprosthesis during TAVR more demanding, particularly in instances of an extremely angulated or horizontal aortic root. Nonetheless, there are limited data on the impact of AA on the acute success of TAVR.
We assessed 582 patients who underwent TAVR at our institute and had contrast computed tomography available for AA evaluation. TAVR endpoints, device success, and adverse events were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions.
The mean angulation of the aorta was 47.3 ± 8.7°. Patients were therefore divided into 2 groups: AA <48° and AA ≥48°. AA in the 480 patients who underwent balloon-expandable (BE) TAVR did not influence acute procedural success or short-term clinical outcome. In contrast, increased AA among the 102 patients who underwent self-expandable (SE) TAVR was found to significantly attenuate procedural success (area under the curve: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 0.85; p = 0.008). The numerical cutoff for AA with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity for device success was ≥48° (sensitivity 85%, specificity 61%). Moreover, patients whose AA was ≥48° were also associated with an increased need for a second valve and post-dilation, had increased fluoroscopy time and increased valve embolization, and had increased post-procedural paravalvular regurgitation greater than or equal to mild following SE TAVR. Major complications at 30 days, including mortality were similar between AA groups. Six-month mortality was also similar between both AA groups.
Increased aortic root angulation adversely influences acute procedural success following SE but not BE TAVR. Because of these data, BE valves may be preferred when evaluating patients with high AA before TAVR.
本研究旨在评估主动脉夹角(AA)增加对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后急性手术成功的影响。
主动脉与心脏之间的夹角程度会使 TAVR 过程中生物假体的准确定位更加困难,尤其是在主动脉根部极度倾斜或水平的情况下。然而,关于 AA 对 TAVR 急性成功的影响的数据有限。
我们评估了在我院接受 TAVR 且有 AA 评估对比计算机断层扫描的 582 例患者。根据 Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 定义,考虑 TAVR 终点、器械成功率和不良事件。
主动脉平均夹角为 47.3°±8.7°。因此,患者被分为 2 组:AA<48°和 AA≥48°。在接受球囊扩张(BE)TAVR 的 480 例患者中,AA 不影响急性手术成功率或短期临床结局。相比之下,在接受自膨式(SE)TAVR 的 102 例患者中,AA 增加显著降低了手术成功率(曲线下面积:0.73;95%置信区间:0.61 至 0.85;p=0.008)。用于器械成功率的 AA 最高灵敏度和特异性的数值截止值为≥48°(灵敏度 85%,特异性 61%)。此外,AA≥48°的患者还需要进行第二次瓣膜置换和后扩张,透视时间增加,瓣膜栓塞增加,并且 SE TAVR 后瓣周漏大于或等于轻度的发生率增加。30 天主要并发症,包括死亡率,在 AA 组之间相似。两组 AA 患者的 6 个月死亡率也相似。
主动脉根部夹角增加对 SE 但不对 BE TAVR 后的急性手术成功率产生不利影响。由于这些数据,在 TAVR 前评估 AA 较高的患者时,可能更倾向于选择 BE 瓣膜。