Chatziralli Irini, Theodossiadis George, Datseris Ioannis, Parikakis Efstratios, Theodossiadis Panagiotis
2nd Department of Ophthalmology, University of Athens, Attikon Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ophthalmic Res. 2017;57(1):54-59. doi: 10.1159/000446658. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anatomical and functional findings in patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) combined with epiretinal membrane (ERM) in the same eye.
In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, we studied 65 patients with VMT and ERM. In 36 of them, ERM/VMT had a 'unified' appearance (group Ι) but in 29, VMT and ERM coexisted without an interrelationship (group ΙΙ). All patients were examined with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). We recorded the macular thickness, the presence, type and location of macular edema, the horizontal diameter of VMT, ellipsoid zone/external limiting membrane (EZ/ELM) status, the vitreofoveal angle of VMT nasally and temporally and the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
Group Ι presented with increased macular thickness, a broader adhesion diameter, extensive EZ/ELM defect and decreased BCVA compared to those where VMT and ERM were not intercorrelated. In group I ('unified' VMT and ERM), cystoid macular edema was found at a greater percentage (41.7%), while in patients where the 2 entities were not intercorrelated, diffuse macular edema was more evident (69%). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in the vitreofoveal angle temporally and nasally.
Macular thickness, type of macular edema, adhesion diameter, the extent of the EZ/ELM defect and BCVA appeared different in cases where VMT and ERM were unified compared to cases where ERM and VMT coexisted but were not intercorrelated.
本研究旨在评估同一只眼中玻璃体黄斑牵拉(VMT)合并视网膜前膜(ERM)患者的解剖学和功能学表现。
在这项回顾性横断面研究中,我们研究了65例VMT和ERM患者。其中36例中,ERM/VMT呈现“统一”外观(Ⅰ组),但在29例中,VMT和ERM共存但无相互关系(Ⅱ组)。所有患者均接受了频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)检查。我们记录了黄斑厚度、黄斑水肿的存在、类型和位置、VMT的水平直径、椭圆体带/外界膜(EZ/ELM)状态、VMT鼻侧和颞侧的玻璃体黄斑角以及最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。
与VMT和ERM无相关性的患者相比,Ⅰ组患者的黄斑厚度增加、粘连直径更宽、EZ/ELM广泛缺损且BCVA降低。在Ⅰ组(“统一”的VMT和ERM)中,黄斑囊样水肿的发生率更高(41.7%),而在这两个实体无相关性的患者中,弥漫性黄斑水肿更明显(69%)。两组在颞侧和鼻侧的玻璃体黄斑角上无统计学显著差异。
与ERM和VMT共存但无相关性的情况相比,VMT和ERM统一的情况下,黄斑厚度、黄斑水肿类型、粘连直径、EZ/ELM缺损程度和BCVA表现不同。